Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28900884›Full record

ArticleLife sciences, society and policy2017

The social dimension of biobanking: objectives and challenges.

E V Bryzgalina, K Y Alasania, T A Varkhotov, S M Gavrilenko, E M Shkomova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life sciences, society and policy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

E V BryzgalinaThe Department of Philosophy of Education, Faculty of Philosophy, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
K Y AlasaniaThe Department of Philosophy of Education, Faculty of Philosophy, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia. alasaniak@yandex.ru.
T A VarkhotovThe Department of Philosophy of Education, Faculty of Philosophy, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
S M GavrilenkoThe Department of Philosophy of Education, Faculty of Philosophy, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
E M ShkomovaThe Department of Philosophy of Education, Faculty of Philosophy, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present article allows to explore, analyze and reflect on the consequences and problems posed by biobanks and attempts to prove the need of social and humanitarian support in establishing and functioning of biobanks as a new type of scientific institutions. The basis of the article is the latest publications devoted to social and humanitarian aspects of biobanking and Russian experience of the initial formation of this subject domain (before the first professional biobanks were established in Russia in the 2010-s, the only highly specialized collections of bio-samples had been registered). The article marks and classifies different aspects of biobanking that objectively demands the participation of specialists in ethics and social sciences. The cases of biobanking development and risks are estimated; the objective need of applied ethics and social sciences specialists' participation in biobanking is proved.

Indexed as

Biological Specimen BanksSocial ResponsibilitySpecimen HandlingTissue BanksBiomedical ResearchHumansInformed ConsentRiskRussiaSocial BehaviorSocial Control PoliciesSocial SciencesSociety social and humanitarian support biobank biobanking social technologies bioethics biotechnologies

Identifiers

PMID28900884
PMCPMC5595704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.