ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2018
Numerical analysis of intracochlear mechanical auditory stimulation using piezoelectric bending actuators.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cochlear implantation can restore a certain degree of auditory impression of patients suffering from profound hearing loss or deafness. Furthermore, studies have shown that in case of residual hearing, patients benefit from the use of a hearing aid in addition to the cochlear implant. The presented studies aim at the improvement of this electromechanical stimulation (EMS) approach by substituting the external hearing aid by an internal stimulus provided by miniaturized piezoelectric actuators. Finite element analyses are performed in order to derive fundamental guidelines for the actuator layout aiming at maximal mechanical stimuli. Further analyses aim at investigating how the actuator position inside the cochlea influences the basilar membrane oscillation profile. While actuator layout guidelines leading to maximized acoustic stimuli could be derived, some of these guidelines are of complementary nature suggesting that further studies under realistic boundary conditions must be performed. Actuator positioning inside the cochlea is shown to have a significant influence on the resulting auditory impression of the patient. Based on the results, the main differences of external and internal stimulation of the cochlea mechanism are identified. It is shown that if the cochlea tonotopy is considered, the frequency selectivity resulting from the mechanical cochlea stimulus may be improved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28900873What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.