ReviewEmergency radiology2018
CT evaluation of musculoskeletal trauma: initial experience with cinematic rendering.
Review in Emergency radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of Cinematic Rendering and Computed Tomography for Speed and Comprehension of Surgical Anatomy.JAMA surgery · 2019Trial
- Advances in abdominal wall imaging: The potential role of cinematic rendering.Emergency radiology · 2026Article
- Cinematic rendering of penetrating cardiac injury.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
- Cinematic rendering in traumatic musculoskeletal injuries of the lower extremity: a pictorial review.Emergency radiology · 2026Review
- Diagnostic performance of dual-energy Rho/Z CT and cinematic rendering in Achilles tendon rupture: a prospective multi-reader study.Skeletal radiology · 2026Article
- The role of 3D cinematic rendering in the evaluation of upper extremity trauma.Emergency radiology · 2024Article
- No-Reference-Based and Noise Level Evaluations of Cinematic Rendering in Bone Computed Tomography.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- Cinematic rendering in the evaluation of complex vascular injury of the lower extremities: how we do it.Emergency radiology · 2023Article
- Review
- The Use of Virtual Reality in Teaching Three-Dimensional Anatomy and Pathology on CT.Journal of digital imaging · 2023Article
- CT of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor.Radiology case reports · 2023Article
- Multimodality imaging of a cardiac paraganglioma: A case report.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Cinematic rendering improves the AO/OTA classification of distal femur fractures compared to volume rendering: a retrospective single-center study.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- 3D CT cinematic rendering of pediatric thoracic vascular anomalies.European journal of radiology open · 2023Article
- A novel computed tomography angiography technique: guided preoperative localization and design of anterolateral thigh perforator flap.Insights into imaging · 2022Article
- Dual-Energy CT and Cinematic Rendering to Improve Assessment of Pelvic Fracture Instability.Radiology · 2022Article
- CT cinematic rendering for glomus jugulare tumor with intracranial extension.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2020Article
- 3D-cinematic rendering for dental and maxillofacial imaging.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2020Article
- Cinematic rendering of skin and subcutaneous soft tissues: potential applications in acute trauma.Emergency radiology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) scanners that can quickly acquire volumetric datasets composed of isotropic voxels laid the groundwork for the widespread clinical implementation of 3D MDCT reconstructions, with maximum intensity projection (MIP) and volumetric rendering (VR) becoming important parts of the imaging evaluation of patients with a wide variety of pathologic conditions. Recently, a new 3D reconstruction technique known as cinematic rendering (CR) has become available and is now U.S. FDA approved. CR bears fundamental similarities to VR, but utilizes a more complex lighting model to bring about photorealistic reconstructions. While a tremendous amount of work remains to be done in order to understand the advantages and disadvantages of CR in comparison to traditional 3D reconstruction methods, the images themselves are strikingly detailed and can be interactively manipulated to highlight a variety of different tissue types and anatomic structures. In the following pictorial essay, we provide a number of clinical examples of the use of CR in musculoskeletal imaging, including the evaluation of complex fractures, the delineation of the relationship of fractures to adjacent vasculature and overlying soft tissues, and the visualization of vascular and soft tissue injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28900773What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.