Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28900353›Full record

ArticleJournal of preventive medicine and hygiene2017

Brain doping: stimulants use and misuse among a sample of Italian college students.

S Majori, D Gazzani, S Pilati, J Paiano, A Sannino, S Ferrari, E Checchin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Non-Medical Use of Prescription Stimulants for Treatment of Attention Disorders by University Students: Characteristics and Associations.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. [Doping for the brain].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2018
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S MajoriDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Hygiene and Environmental Occupational Preventive Medicine Division, University of Verona, Italy.
D GazzaniPostgraduate Specialization in "Hygiene and Preventive Medicine", University of Verona, Italy.
S PilatiPostgraduate Specialization in "Hygiene and Preventive Medicine", University of Verona, Italy.
J PaianoPostgraduate Specialization in "Hygiene and Preventive Medicine", University of Verona, Italy.
A SanninoPostgraduate Specialization in "Hygiene and Preventive Medicine", University of Verona, Italy.
S FerrariPostgraduate Specialization in "Hygiene and Preventive Medicine", University of Verona, Italy.
E ChecchinPostgraduate Specialization in "Hygiene and Preventive Medicine", University of Verona, Italy.
University of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe non-medical use of prescription stimulants (NMUPS) has become the subject of great interest for its diffusion among university students, who abuse these substances to cope with the increasing load of academic stress. NMUPS has been widely investigated in the U.S. due to its increasing trend; this behavior, however, has also been reported in Europe. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to examine stimulants misuse in a Northern Italian geographic area, identifying possible developments of the phenomenon in Italy.

methodsTo evaluate academic and extra-academic NMUPS (Methylphenidate and Amphetamines), an anonymous multiplechoice questionnaire was administrated to a sample of Bachelor's and Master's degrees students attending a University North East of Italy. Data elaboration and CI 95% were performed with Excel software 2013. Fisher's exact tests were performed using Graph- Pad INSTAT software.

resultsData from 899 correctly completed questionnaires were analyzed in this study. 11.3% of students reported NMUPS, with an apparent greater use by students aged 18-22 years (73.5%) and without any statistically significant gender predominance. Fifty-seven point eight percent of students used stimulants at most five times in six months, and the most frequent academic and extra-academic reasons to use them were respectively to improve concentration while studying (51.0%) and sports performance (25.5%). NMUPS was higher among working students than nonworking ones (p < 0.05), suggesting a use of stimulants to cope with stress by the first ones.

conclusionsThese exploratory and preliminary data suggest that NMUPS is quite relevant in Northern Italy, suggesting a need for preventive and monitoring measures, as well as future analysis via a longitudinal multicenter study.

Indexed as

AchievementAdolescentCentral Nervous System StimulantsFemaleHumansItalyMalePrescription Drug MisuseStudentsSurveys and QuestionnairesUniversitiesYoung AdultCentral Nervous System StimulantsCollege studentsDopingStimulants

Identifiers

PMID28900353
PMCPMC5584082
OpenAlexW2750881165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.