Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28900351›Full record

ReviewJournal of preventive medicine and hygiene2017

An overview of different health indicators used in the European Health Systems.

M Gaeta, F Campanella, L Capasso, G M Schifino, L Gentile, G Banfi, G Pelissero, C Ricci

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Differences in hip fracture care in Europe: a systematic review of recent annual reports of hip fracture registries.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

M GaetaDepartment of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
F CampanellaDepartment of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
L CapassoDepartment of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
G M SchifinoDepartment of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
L GentileDepartment of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
G BanfiIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.
G PelisseroDepartment of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
C RicciDepartment of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
University of Pavia · ITIstituto Ortopedico Galeazzi · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn the European Union three different health systems could be defined according to service delivery, financing, and economic policies: Beveridge, Bismarck and Mixed system. Although health systems are hardly to compare, various organizations are developing methods assessing performance. In the present work the performance of the three systems were evaluated using European Community Health Indicators according to Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

methodsThe study has been conducted among the 28 states of the European Union using the following indicators: Standardized death rate for diseases of the circulatory system, standardized death rate of malignant neoplasms, road traffic accidents with injury, life expectancy at birth, incidence of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), infant deaths, pure alcohol consumption, infants vaccinated against Diphtheria Tetanus Pertussis (DTP), public and total expenditure on health over the period 2001-2010.

resultsThe variation of health indicators over the observational time shows similar trend of circulatory system diseases and malignant neoplasms death rates, road accidents with injury, infant deaths, life expectancy at birth, public and total health expenditure. Some differences in the trend of HIV incidence, alcohol intake and DTP vaccination rates arise among systems. Grouping countries by health system paradigm and geographical area, resulted in a relevant heterogeneity (I

conclusionsIn accordance with the evidence of our study, it can be stated that best performances are more likely to be linked to country specific economic factors. In conclusion, it was not possible to identify the best health system model.

Indexed as

Health Status IndicatorsDelivery of Health CareEuropeHealth Services ResearchHumansModels, OrganizationalQuality of Health CareEuropeHealth care performanceHealth indicatorsHealth systems

Identifiers

PMID28900351
PMCPMC5584080
OpenAlexW2741528272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.