Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28900327›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of medical and paediatric oncology : official journal of Indian Society of Medical & Paediatric Oncology

Metastatic Ewing's Sarcoma: Revisiting the "Evidence on the Fence".

Nehal Khanna, Avinash Pandey, Jyoti Bajpai

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of medical and paediatric oncology : official journal of Indian Society of Medical & Paediatric Oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Outcomes of extraskeletal vs. skeletal Ewing sarcoma patients treated with standard chemotherapy protocol.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2020
    Article
  18. Tissue-Engineered Bone Tumor as a Reproducible Human in Vitro Model for Studies of Anticancer Drugs.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nehal KhannaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Avinash PandeyDepartment of Medical Oncology, IGIMS, Patna, Bihar, India.
Jyoti BajpaiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Tata Memorial Hospital · INIndira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metastatic Ewing's sarcoma is a challenging disease for oncology care providers with wide spectrum of disease at presentation, widely varying approach to the treatment and varied outcomes. The paucity of randomized evidence is a barrier in developing a consensus. This perspective provides the evidence "for and against" the benefit of aggressive approach including local and systemic therapy in patients presenting with metastatic Ewing's sarcoma and provide general recommendations so as to help select patients who will benefit with definitive intent treatment and also, avoid aggressive approach in patients with dismal outcome.

Indexed as

Bone metastasiscurativeEwing's sarcomalung metastasispalliative

Identifiers

PMID28900327
PMCPMC5582556
OpenAlexW2968509465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.