Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28900038›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2017

SOCS1 is an inducible negative regulator of interferon λ (IFN-λ)-induced gene expression

Tanja Blumer, Mairene Coto-Llerena, Francois H T Duong, Markus H Heim

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Mechanisms of Differential Signal Transduction by IFNLR1 Variants.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Function of Interferon Lambda Receptor 1 Variants in Stem Cell-Derived Hepatocytes with Abrogated EndogenousJournal of interferon & cytokine research : the official journal of the International Society for Interferon and Cytokine Research · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tanja BlumerFrom the Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland and.
Mairene Coto-LlerenaFrom the Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland and.
Francois H T DuongFrom the Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland and.
Markus H HeimFrom the Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland and markus.heim@unibas.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-7523-4894
University of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Type I (α and β) and type III (λ) IFNs are induced upon viral infection through host sensory pathways that activate IFN regulatory factors (IRFs) and nuclear factor κB. Secreted IFNs induce autocrine and paracrine signaling through the JAK-STAT pathway, leading to the transcriptional induction of hundreds of IFN-stimulated genes, among them sensory pathway components such as cGAS, STING, RIG-I, MDA5, and the transcription factor IRF7, which enhance the induction of IFN-αs and IFN-λs. This positive feedback loop enables a very rapid and strong host response that, at some point, has to be controlled by negative regulators to maintain tissue homeostasis. Type I IFN signaling is controlled by the inducible negative regulators suppressor of cytokine signaling 1 (SOCS1), SOCS3, and ubiquitin-specific peptidase 18 (USP18). The physiological role of these proteins in IFN-γ signaling has not been clarified. Here we used knockout cell lines and mice to show that IFN-λ signaling is regulated by SOCS1 but not by SOCS3 or USP18. These differences were the basis for the distinct kinetic properties of type I and III IFNs. We found that IFN-α signaling is transient and becomes refractory after hours, whereas IFN-λ provides a long-lasting IFN-stimulated gene induction.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Line, TumorCyclic Guanosine Monophosphate-Adenosine Monophosphate SynthaseDEAD Box Protein 58EndopeptidasesGene Expression RegulationHumansInterferon-Induced Helicase, IFIH1InterferonsMembrane ProteinsMiceMice, KnockoutNucleotidyltransferasesReceptors, ImmunologicSignal TransductionSTING ProteincGAS protein, humancGAS protein, mouseCyclic Guanosine Monophosphate-Adenosine Monophosphate SynthaseDdx58 protein, mouseDEAD Box Protein 58EndopeptidasesIFIH1 protein, humanIfih1 protein, mouseInterferon-Induced Helicase, IFIH1InterferonsMembrane ProteinsNucleotidyltransferasesReceptors, ImmunologicRIGI protein, humanSOCS1 protein, humanSocs1 protein, mouseSOCS3 protein, humanSocs3 protein, mouseSTING1 protein, humanSting1 protein, mouseSTING ProteinSuppressor of Cytokine Signaling 1 ProteinSuppressor of Cytokine Signaling 3 ProteinUbiquitin ThiolesteraseUSP18 protein, humanUsp18 protein, mouseHepatitis C virus (HCV)IFN λinterferonJAKSTAT transcription factorsuppressor of cytokine signaling 3 (SOCS3)

Identifiers

PMID28900038
PMCPMC5663890
OpenAlexW2905090539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.