ReviewBioscience reports2017
X-ray data processing.
Review in Bioscience reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bragg Spot Finder (BSF): a new machine-learning-aided approach to deal with spot finding for rapidly filtering diffraction pattern images.Journal of applied crystallography · 2024Article
- Emerging Topics in Protein Crystallography.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Electron counting with direct electron detectors in MicroED.Structure (London, England : 1993) · 2023Article
- Cryogenic X-ray crystallographic studies of biomacromolecules at Turkish Light Source "Turkish journal of biology = Turk biyoloji dergisi · 2023Article
- Structure ofLife science alliance · 2022Article
- Structure of Aedes aegypti carboxypeptidase B1-inhibitor complex uncover the disparity between mosquito and non-mosquito insect carboxypeptidase inhibition mechanism.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2021Article
- Modeling and Structure Determination of Homo-Oligomeric Proteins: An Overview of Challenges and Current Approaches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- FragMAXapp: crystallographic fragment-screening data-analysis and project-management system.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2021Article
- Challenges in solving structures from radiation-damaged tomograms of protein nanocrystals assessed by simulation.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2021Article
- Facilitated crystal handling using a simple device for evaporation reduction in microtiter plates.Journal of applied crystallography · 2021Article
- Research journey of respirasome.Protein & cell · 2020Review
- Time-Resolved Macromolecular Crystallography at Pulsed X-ray Sources.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The method of molecular structure determination by X-ray crystallography is a little over a century old. The history is described briefly, along with developments in X-ray sources and detectors. The fundamental processes involved in measuring diffraction patterns on area detectors, i.e. autoindexing, refining crystal and detector parameters, integrating the reflections themselves and putting the resultant measurements on to a common scale are discussed, with particular reference to the most commonly used software in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.