Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28899842›Full record

Trial reportAcademic pediatrics2018

Identifying Which Urban Children With Asthma Benefit Most From Clinician Prompting: Subgroup Analyses From the Prompting Asthma Intervention in Rochester-Uniting Parents and Providers (PAIR-UP) Trial.

Nicolas P N Goldstein, Sean M Frey, Maria Fagnano, Sande O Okelo, Jill S Halterman

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Academic pediatrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nicolas P N GoldsteinDivision of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY. Electronic address: nicolas_goldstein@urmc.rochester.edu.
Sean M FreyDivision of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY.
Maria FagnanoDivision of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY.
Sande O OkeloDivision of Pediatric Pulmonology, Department of Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, Calif.
Jill S HaltermanDivision of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY.
University of Rochester · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · US

Funding

Telemedicine Enhanced Asthma Management through the Emergency Department (TEAM-ED)R01HL091835 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI HALTERMAN, JILL S · 2009 to 2020
$7.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL091835
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveClinician prompts increase the likelihood of guideline-recommended corrective actions (preventive medication prescription, dose change, and/or adherence promotion) for symptomatic children with poorly controlled or persistent asthma in the primary care setting, but it is unclear if all children equally benefit. The objectives of this study were to identify whether asthma severity, visit type, and current preventive medication use were predictive of corrective actions during visits for children with symptomatic asthma, and determine whether these factors modified the effect of a prompting intervention.

methodsWe conducted prespecified subgroup analyses of a cluster randomized controlled trial of physician prompting that promoted guideline-based asthma management for urban children with symptomatic asthma. We tested predictors of corrective actions with bivariate and multivariate multilevel logistic regressions, compared intervention effects across factor categories via stratified analyses, and characterized effect modification with interaction term analyses.

resultsPrompting intervention exposure, moderate/severe disease, asthma-focused visits, and current preventive medication use were predictive of corrective actions. The prompting intervention significantly increased the rate of corrective actions for children across categories of disease severity, visit type, and preventive medication use. However, the intervention effect was significantly smaller for children already using a preventive medication (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19-3.38) compared with children without preventive medication use (adjusted OR, 6.25; 95% CI, 3.39-11.54).

conclusionsPrompting increases the likelihood of corrective actions during clinic encounters; however, children already using preventive medication benefit less. It is critical for providers to recognize the need for corrective actions among these symptomatic children.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareReminder SystemsAnti-Asthmatic AgentsAsthmaChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansInfantLogistic ModelsMaleMultilevel AnalysisMultivariate AnalysisOdds RatioPractice Guidelines as TopicAnti-Asthmatic Agentsasthmachildhoodpreventionprimary careprovider promptingsubgroup analysis

Identifiers

PMID28899842
PMCPMC5844785
OpenAlexW2752800040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.