Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28899609›Full record

ReviewTrends in cognitive sciences2017

Constructing Experience: Event Models from Perception to Action.

Lauren L Richmond, Jeffrey M Zacks

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in cognitive sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. A neural mechanism for online discovery of latent contexts.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Role of Event Number and Duration in Time-Compressed Memory Replay.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lauren L RichmondDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, 1 Brookings Drive, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA.
Jeffrey M ZacksDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, 1 Brookings Drive, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA. Electronic address: jzacks@wustl.edu.

Funding

EVENT ENCODING IN NAVIGATION AND SPATIAL MEMORYR21AG041419 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SARGENT, JESSE Q., ZACKS, JEFFREY M · 2012 to 2013
$405k
Training Long-Term Memory for EventsF32AG050400 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI RICHMOND, LAUREN L. · 2015 to 2017
$169k
NIA NIH HHS F32 AG050400NIA NIH HHS R21 AG041419
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mental representations of everyday experience are rich, structured, and multimodal. In this article we consider the adaptive pressures that led to human construction of such representations, arguing that structured event representations enable cognitive systems to more effectively predict the trajectory of naturalistic everyday activity. We propose an account of how cortical systems and the hippocampus (HPC) interact to construct, maintain, and update event representations. This analysis throws light on recent research on story comprehension, event segmentation, episodic memory, and action planning. It also suggests how the growing science base can be deployed to diagnose impairments in event perception and memory, and to improve memory for everyday events.

Indexed as

Motor ActivityPerceptionHumansMemory, EpisodicModels, Psychologicalaction planningbindingepisodic memoryevent cognitionevent segmentation

Identifiers

PMID28899609
PMCPMC5694361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.