Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28899361›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2017

Interactive visual exploration and refinement of cluster assignments.

Michael Kern, Alexander Lex, Nils Gehlenborg, Chris R Johnson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael KernScientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, 72 Sout Central Campus Drive, Salt Lake City, 84112, USA.
Alexander LexScientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, 72 Sout Central Campus Drive, Salt Lake City, 84112, USA. alex@sci.utah.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6930-5468
Nils GehlenborgDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, 02115, USA.
Chris R JohnsonScientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, 72 Sout Central Campus Drive, Salt Lake City, 84112, USA.

Funding

TRD - VisualizationP41GM103545 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI JURRUS, ELIZABETH · 2012 to 2019
$9.7M
Visual Analysis of Genomic and Clinical Data from Large Patient CohortsU01CA198935 · NCI · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI PARK, PETER J · 2015 to 2017
$1.5M
Visualization of (Epi)Genomic Data for Discovery of Disease-Associated VariantsR00HG007583 · NHGRI · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI GEHLENBORG, NILS · 2015 to 2017
$727k
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA198935NHGRI NIH HHS R00 HG007583NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103545
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith ever-increasing amounts of data produced in biology research, scientists are in need of efficient data analysis methods. Cluster analysis, combined with visualization of the results, is one such method that can be used to make sense of large data volumes. At the same time, cluster analysis is known to be imperfect and depends on the choice of algorithms, parameters, and distance measures. Most clustering algorithms don't properly account for ambiguity in the source data, as records are often assigned to discrete clusters, even if an assignment is unclear. While there are metrics and visualization techniques that allow analysts to compare clusterings or to judge cluster quality, there is no comprehensive method that allows analysts to evaluate, compare, and refine cluster assignments based on the source data, derived scores, and contextual data.

resultsIn this paper, we introduce a method that explicitly visualizes the quality of cluster assignments, allows comparisons of clustering results and enables analysts to manually curate and refine cluster assignments. Our methods are applicable to matrix data clustered with partitional, hierarchical, and fuzzy clustering algorithms. Furthermore, we enable analysts to explore clustering results in context of other data, for example, to observe whether a clustering of genomic data results in a meaningful differentiation in phenotypes.

conclusionsOur methods are integrated into Caleydo StratomeX, a popular, web-based, disease subtype analysis tool. We show in a usage scenario that our approach can reveal ambiguities in cluster assignments and produce improved clusterings that better differentiate genotypes and phenotypes.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsUser-Computer InterfaceCluster AnalysisGenotypeHumansInternetNeoplasmsPhenotypeBiology visualizationCluster analysisOmics dataVisualization

Identifiers

PMID28899361
PMCPMC5596943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.