Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28899358›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2017

Visualization of chromosome condensation in plants with large chromosomes.

Maria A Kuznetsova, Inna A Chaban, Eugene V Sheval

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Graft Biology in the CRISPR Era: From Tissue Fusion to Genome Compatibility.Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Helical coiling of metaphase chromatids.Nucleic acids research · 2023
    Article
  5. The Sister Chromatid Division of the Heteromorphic Sex Chromosomes inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Emergent properties of mitotic chromosomes.Current opinion in cell biology · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Mitotic chromosome organization: General rules meet species-specific variability.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maria A KuznetsovaBelozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119992, Moscow, Russia.
Inna A ChabanAll-Russian Research Institute of Agricultural Biotechnology, Timiryazevskaja 42, 127550, Moscow, Russia.
Eugene V ShevalBelozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119992, Moscow, Russia. sheval_e@belozersky.msu.ru.
All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Food Biotechnology · RULomonosov Moscow State University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost data concerning chromosome organization have been acquired from studies of a small number of model organisms, the majority of which are mammals. In plants with large genomes, the chromosomes are significantly larger than the animal chromosomes that have been studied to date, and it is possible that chromosome condensation in such plants was modified during evolution. Here, we analyzed chromosome condensation and decondensation processes in order to find structural mechanisms that allowed for an increase in chromosome size.

resultsWe found that anaphase and telophase chromosomes of plants with large chromosomes (average 2C DNA content exceeded 0.8 pg per chromosome) contained chromatin-free cavities in their axial regions in contrast to well-characterized animal chromosomes, which have high chromatin density in the axial regions. Similar to animal chromosomes, two intermediates of chromatin folding were visible inside condensing (during prophase) and decondensing (during telophase) chromosomes of Nigella damascena: approximately 150 nm chromonemata and approximately 300 nm fibers. The spatial folding of the latter fibers occurs in a fundamentally different way than in animal chromosomes, which leads to the formation of chromosomes with axial chromatin-free cavities.

conclusionDifferent compaction topology, but not the number of compaction levels, allowed for the evolution of increased chromosome size in plants.

Indexed as

ChromatinChromatin Assembly and DisassemblyChromosomes, PlantChromosome StructuresDNA, PlantGenome, PlantGenome SizeMitosisNigella damascenaChromatinDNA, PlantChromonemaChromosomeCondensationEvolutionMitosisPlants

Identifiers

PMID28899358
PMCPMC5596468
OpenAlexW2755632159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.