ArticleBrain connectivity2017
Anti-Fragmentation of Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Connectivity Networks with Node-Wise Thresholding.
Article in Brain connectivity, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)-based functional connectivity networks are often constructed by thresholding a correlation matrix of nodal time courses. In a typical thresholding approach known as hard thresholding, a single threshold is applied to the entire correlation matrix to identify edges representing superthreshold correlations. However, hard thresholding is known to produce a network with uneven allocation of edges, resulting in a fragmented network with a large number of disconnected nodes. It is suggested that an alternative network thresholding approach, node-wise thresholding, is able to overcome these problems. To examine this, various network characteristics were compared between networks constructed by hard thresholding and node-wise thresholding, with publicly available resting-state fMRI data from 123 healthy young subjects. It was found that networks constructed with hard thresholding included a large number of disconnected nodes, while such network fragmentation was not observed in networks formed with node-wise thresholding. Moreover, in hard thresholding networks, fragmentized modular organization was observed, characterized by a large number of small modules. On the contrary, such modular fragmentation was not observed in node-wise thresholding networks, producing modules that were robust at any threshold and highly consistent across subjects. These results indicate that node-wise thresholding may lead to less fragmented networks. Moreover, node-wise thresholding enables robust characterization of network properties without much influence by the selection of a threshold.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.