ReviewFEMS yeast research2017
Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for second-generation ethanol production: from academic exploration to industrial implementation.
Review in FEMS yeast research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
70 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mitochondrial localization of key NADApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026Article
- Sedimentation accelerates mixed-substrate conversion during sequential batch cultivation of a co-culture of sugar-specialist yeast strains.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2026Article
- Sustainable Production of Biofuels from Lignocellulosic Biomass Using Microbial Applications: Status, Challenges and Prospects.Molecular biotechnology · 2026Review
- Identification of a crucialmSystems · 2025Article
- RNA Polymerase III Promoters Compatible with CRISPR Gene Regulation inACS synthetic biology · 2025Article
- Identifying promoters to enhance heterologous gene expression in recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains cultivated on non-native substrates.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Microbial consortia for the conversion of biomass into fuels and chemicals.Nature communications · 2025Review
- Regulatory mechanism of Haa1p and Hap4p in Saccharomyces cerevisiae to mixed acetic acid and formic acid when fermenting mixed glucose and xylose.Microbial cell factories · 2025Article
- Metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for efficient utilization of pectin-rich biomass.Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) · 2025Review
- Advancing cellulose utilization and engineering consolidated bioprocessing yeasts: current state and perspectives.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Perspectives on current and future yeast technologies for ethanol-based biofuels and bioproducts.FEMS yeast research · 2025Review
- Glucose receptor deletion and engineering: impact on xylose sensing and utilization in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.FEMS yeast research · 2025Article
- Regulatory Role of Vacuolar Calcium Transport Proteins in Growth, Calcium Signaling, and Cellulase Production inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Quantitative physiology and biomass composition of Cyberlindnera jadinii in ethanol-grown cultures.Biotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts · 2024Article
- Article
- Enhanced upgrading of lignocellulosic substrates by coculture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Acinetobacter baylyi ADP1.Biotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts · 2024Article
- Article
- Compositional and temporal division of labor modulates mixed sugar fermentation by an engineered yeast consortium.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Specific growth rates and growth stoichiometries of Saccharomycotina yeasts on ethanol as sole carbon and energy substrate.FEMS yeast research · 2024Article
- Enhancing xylose-fermentation capacity of engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae by multistep evolutionary engineering in inhibitor-rich lignocellulose hydrolysate.FEMS yeast research · 2024Article
10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The recent start-up of several full-scale 'second generation' ethanol plants marks a major milestone in the development of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates of agricultural residues and energy crops. After a discussion of the challenges that these novel industrial contexts impose on yeast strains, this minireview describes key metabolic engineering strategies that have been developed to address these challenges. Additionally, it outlines how proof-of-concept studies, often developed in academic settings, can be used for the development of robust strain platforms that meet the requirements for industrial application. Fermentation performance of current engineered industrial S. cerevisiae strains is no longer a bottleneck in efforts to achieve the projected outputs of the first large-scale second-generation ethanol plants. Academic and industrial yeast research will continue to strengthen the economic value position of second-generation ethanol production by further improving fermentation kinetics, product yield and cellular robustness under process conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.