Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28898116›Full record

ArticleTraffic injury prevention2018

Adaptive response criteria in road hazard detection among older drivers.

Jing Feng, HeeSun Choi, Fergus I M Craik, Brian Levine, Sylvain Moreno, Gary Naglie, Motao Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Traffic injury prevention, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Driving Hazard Perception Tests: A Systematic Review.Bulletin of emergency and trauma · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jing Fenga Department of Psychology , North Carolina State University , Raleigh , North Carolina.
HeeSun Choia Department of Psychology , North Carolina State University , Raleigh , North Carolina.
Fergus I M Craikb Rotman Research Institute , Baycrest Health Sciences , Toronto , Ontario , Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8073-3236
Brian Levineb Rotman Research Institute , Baycrest Health Sciences , Toronto , Ontario , Canada.
Sylvain Morenob Rotman Research Institute , Baycrest Health Sciences , Toronto , Ontario , Canada.
Gary Naglieb Rotman Research Institute , Baycrest Health Sciences , Toronto , Ontario , Canada.
Motao Zhuc Center for Injury Research and Policy , The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital , Columbus , Ohio.

Funding

Licensing Laws, Mobility, and Traffic Safety among Older AdultsR01AG050581 · NIA · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI ZHU, MOTAO · 2015 to 2019
$1.0M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG050581
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe majority of existing investigations on attention, aging, and driving have focused on the negative impacts of age-related declines in attention on hazard detection and driver performance. However, driving skills and behavioral compensation may accommodate for the negative effects that age-related attentional decline places on driving performance. In this study, we examined an important question that had been largely neglected in the literature linking attention, aging, and driving: can top-down factors such as behavioral compensation, specifically adaptive response criteria, accommodate the negative impacts from age-related attention declines on hazard detection during driving?

methodsIn the experiment, we used the Drive Aware Task, a task combining the driving context with well-controlled laboratory procedures measuring attention. We compared younger (n = 16, age 21-30) and older (n = 21, age 65-79) drivers on their attentional processing of hazards in driving scenes, indexed by percentage of correct responses and reaction time of hazard detection, as well as sensitivity and response criteria using signal detection analysis.

resultsOlder drivers, in general, were less accurate and slower on the task than younger drivers. However, results from this experiment revealed that older, but not younger, drivers adapted their response criteria when the traffic condition changed in the driving scenes. When there was more traffic in the driving scene, older drivers became more liberal in their responses, meaning that they were more likely to report that a driving hazard was detected.

conclusionsOlder drivers adopt compensatory strategies for hazard detection during driving. Our findings showed that, in the driving context, even at an older age our attentional functions are still adaptive according to environmental conditions. This leads to considerations on potential training methods to promote adaptive strategies that may help older drivers maintain performance in road hazard detection.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAgingAttentionAutomobile DrivingFemaleHumansMaleReaction TimeYoung AdultadaptiveAgingattentiondrivinghazard detectionresponse criterion

Identifiers

PMID28898116
PMCPMC5921861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.