ReviewExpert review of proteomics2017
Unravelling the biology of chromatin in health and cancer using proteomic approaches.
Review in Expert review of proteomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Biomarkers of tumor invasiveness in proteomics (Review).International journal of oncology · 2020Pooled it
- Introducing ADNP and SIRT1 as new partners regulating microtubules and histone methylation.Molecular psychiatry · 2021Article
- Interactions With Histone H3 & Tools to Study Them.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionChromatin remodeling complexes play important roles in the control of genome regulation in both normal and diseased states, and are therefore critical components for the regulation of epigenetic states in cells. Given the role epigenetics plays in cancer, for example, chromatin remodeling complexes are routinely targeted for therapeutic intervention. Areas covered: Protein mass spectrometry and proteomics are powerful technologies used to study and understand chromatin remodeling. While impressive progress has been made in this area, there remain significant challenges in the application of proteomic technologies to the study of chromatin remodeling. As parts of large multi-subunit complexes that can be heavily modified with dynamic post-translational modifications, challenges in the study of chromatin remodeling complexes include defining the content, determining the regulation, and studying the dynamics of the complexes under different cellular states. Expert commentary: Impwortant considerations in the study of chromatin remodeling complexes include the complexity of sample preparation, the choice of proteomic methods for the analysis of samples, and data analysis challenges. Continued research in these three areas promise to yield even greater insights into the biology of chromatin remodeling and epigenetics and the dynamics of these systems in human health and cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.