Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28895435›Full record

ReviewExpert opinion on drug delivery2018

Intranasal delivery of stem cell-based therapies for the treatment of brain malignancies.

Gina Li, Nicolas Bonamici, Mahua Dey, Maciej S Lesniak, Irina V Balyasnikova

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert opinion on drug delivery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Computational,Biomedicines · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gina Lia Department of Neurological Surgery , Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University , Chicago , IL , USA.
Nicolas Bonamicia Department of Neurological Surgery , Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University , Chicago , IL , USA.
Mahua Deyb Department of Neurological Surgery , Indiana University , Indianapolis , IN , USA.
Maciej S Lesniaka Department of Neurological Surgery , Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University , Chicago , IL , USA.
Irina V Balyasnikovaa Department of Neurological Surgery , Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University , Chicago , IL , USA.

Funding

Regulatory T Cells and Oncolytic Virotherapy of GliomaR01CA122930 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI LESNIAK, MACIEJ S · 2008 to 2015
$2.5M
Intranasal Stem-Cell Based Therapy for GlioblastomaR01NS087990 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI BALYASNIKOVA, IRINA V · 2014 to 2018
$2.1M
Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells in Malignant GliomaK08NS092895 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DEY, MAHUA · 2016 to 2020
$917k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA122930NINDS NIH HHS K08 NS092895NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS087990
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGlioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive malignant brain cancer in adults, and its poor prognosis and resistance to the existing standard of care require the development of innovative therapeutic modalities. The local delivery of stem cells as therapeutic carriers against glioma has produced encouraging results, but encounters obstacles with regards to the repeatability and invasiveness of administration. Intranasal delivery of therapeutic stem cells could overcome these obstacles, among others, as a noninvasive and easily repeatable mode of administration. AREAS COVERED: This review describes nasal anatomy, routes of stem cell migration, and factors affecting stem cell delivery to hard-to-reach tumors. Furthermore, this review discusses the molecular mechanisms underlying stem cell migration following delivery, as well as possible stem cell effector functions to be considered in combination with intranasal delivery. EXPERT OPINION: Further research is necessary to elucidate the dynamics of stem cell effector functions in the context of intranasal delivery and optimize their therapeutic potency. Nonetheless, the technique represents a promising tool against brain cancer and has the potential to be expanded for use against other brain pathologies.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsStem Cell TransplantationAdministration, IntranasalAdultBrain NeoplasmsCell MovementGlioblastomaHumansNeural Stem CellsCNS deliveryGlioblastomaintranasal deliverymalignant gliomastem cells

Identifiers

PMID28895435
PMCPMC5847369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.