Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28895078›Full record

ArticleDemography2017

The Growth, Scope, and Spatial Distribution of People With Felony Records in the United States, 1948-2010.

Sarah K S Shannon, Christopher Uggen, Jason Schnittker, Melissa Thompson, Sara Wakefield, Michael Massoglia

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Demography, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
97.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 338 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Heterogeneous and racialized impacts of state incarceration policies on birth outcomes in the United States.Social forces; a scientific medium of social study and interpretation · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. What Is Wrong with Monetary Sanctions? Directions for Policy, Practice, and Research.The Russell Sage Foundation journal of the social sciences : RSF · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah K S ShannonDepartment of Sociology, University of Georgia, 113 Baldwin Hall, Athens, GA, 30602, USA. sshannon@uga.edu.
Christopher UggenDepartment of Sociology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Jason SchnittkerDepartment of Sociology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Melissa ThompsonDepartment of Sociology, Portland State University, Portland, OR, USA.
Sara WakefieldSchool of Criminal Justice, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Michael MassogliaDepartment of Sociology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Portland State University · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity of Georgia · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Scientific and Technical CoreP2CHD047873 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Katherine J. Curtis · 2014 to 2026
$5.1M
Minnesota Population Center Science and Technical CoreP2CHD041023 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI THERESA LOUISE OSYPUK · 2016 to 2026
$4.3M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041023NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD047873
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The steep rise in U.S. criminal punishment in recent decades has spurred scholarship on the collateral consequences of imprisonment for individuals, families, and communities. Several excellent studies have estimated the number of people who have been incarcerated and the collateral consequences they face, but far less is known about the size and scope of the total U.S. population with felony convictions beyond prison walls, including those who serve their sentences on probation or in jail. This article develops state-level estimates based on demographic life tables and extends previous national estimates of the number of people with felony convictions to 2010. We estimate that 3 % of the total U.S. adult population and 15 % of the African American adult male population has ever been to prison; people with felony convictions account for 8 % of all adults and 33 % of the African American adult male population. We discuss the far-reaching consequences of the spatial concentration and immense growth of these groups since 1980.

Indexed as

AdultBlack or African AmericanCrimeCriminalsDatabases, FactualDemographyGeographic Information SystemsHumansLife TablesMaleMiddle AgedMortalityPrisonersPrisonsRacial GroupsSocioeconomic FactorsFelony convictionIncarcerationInequalityPunishment

Identifiers

PMID28895078
PMCPMC5996985
OpenAlexW2755233168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.