Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28895069›Full record

ArticleDrugs in R&D2017

Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy of an Alternative Schedule of Sunitinib for the Treatment of Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study.

Sebastiano Buti, Maddalena Donini, Melissa Bersanelli, Alessia Gattara, Francesco Leonardi, Rodolfo Passalacqua

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drugs in R&D, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sebastiano ButiMedical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Via Gramsci 14, 43126, Parma, Italy.
Maddalena DoniniOncology Unit, Oncology Department, ASST Ospedale di Cremona, Cremona, Italy.
Melissa BersanelliMedical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Via Gramsci 14, 43126, Parma, Italy. bersamel@libero.it.
Alessia GattaraMedical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Via Gramsci 14, 43126, Parma, Italy.
Francesco LeonardiMedical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Via Gramsci 14, 43126, Parma, Italy.
Rodolfo PassalacquaOncology Unit, Oncology Department, ASST Ospedale di Cremona, Cremona, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStandard treatment with sunitinib for patients with metastatic renal cancer provides an 'on-off' schedule (daily administration of a 50-mg capsule for 4 weeks, followed by a 2-week break; consecutive 6-week cycles). We developed an alternative intermittent schedule to reduce the toxicity and symptoms of tumor regrowth during the rest period and to allow prolonged continuation of therapy, maintaining dose intensity.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to provide a retrospective evaluation of the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of an alternative schedule of sunitinib in patients who did not tolerate classical treatment.

methodsPatients treated with the classical schedule with at least grade 2 toxicity or recurrence of symptoms during the rest period were switched to an alternative schedule (the same daily dose 5 consecutive days per week for 5 weeks and then the same daily dose on days 1, 3, and 5 in the sixth week; consecutive 6-week cycles).

resultsTwenty-five patients were enrolled. The median time from sunitinib initiation to schedule switch was 2.9 months. After the switch, the median therapy duration was 9.2 months. Rate of delay, corrected by cycle number, was 10% for both schedules. After the switch, 48.7% of patients obtained a toxicity reduction (hypertension -82%, stomatitis -71%, cutaneous toxicity -69%). A reduction in 'on-off symptoms' (-86%) was achieved. Overall response rate was 40% and the disease control rate was 80%. Median progression-free survival was 16.4 months and median overall survival was 41.3 months.

conclusionsDespite the small sample size and retrospective nature, we demonstrated the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of the alternative schedule, allowing prolonged treatment and better quality of life.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Renal CellDisease-Free SurvivalDrug Administration ScheduleFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansIndolesKidney NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPyrrolesQuality of LifeAntineoplastic AgentsIndolesPyrrolesSunitinib

Identifiers

PMID28895069
PMCPMC5694422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.