Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28895025›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2017

Leaching variations of heavy metals in chelator-assisted phytoextraction by Zea mays L. exposed to acid rainfall.

Yayin Lu, Dinggui Luo, Lirong Liu, Zicong Tan, An Lai, Guowei Liu, Junhui Li, Jianyou Long, Xuexia Huang, Yongheng Chen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Comparative Activation Process of Pb, Cd and Tl Using Chelating Agents from Contaminated Red Soils.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  3. Insights into Heavy Metals Leakage in Chelator-Induced Phytoextraction of Pb- and Tl-Contaminated Soil.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yayin LuSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guangzhou University, No. 230, West Waihuan Road, Higher Education Mega Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510006, China.
Dinggui LuoSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guangzhou University, No. 230, West Waihuan Road, Higher Education Mega Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510006, China. ldggq@gzhu.edu.cn.
Lirong LiuSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guangzhou University, No. 230, West Waihuan Road, Higher Education Mega Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510006, China.
Zicong TanSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guangzhou University, No. 230, West Waihuan Road, Higher Education Mega Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510006, China.
An LaiSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guangzhou University, No. 230, West Waihuan Road, Higher Education Mega Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510006, China.
Guowei LiuSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guangzhou University, No. 230, West Waihuan Road, Higher Education Mega Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510006, China.
Junhui LiSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guangzhou University, No. 230, West Waihuan Road, Higher Education Mega Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510006, China.
Jianyou LongSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guangzhou University, No. 230, West Waihuan Road, Higher Education Mega Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510006, China.
Xuexia HuangSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guangzhou University, No. 230, West Waihuan Road, Higher Education Mega Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510006, China.
Yongheng ChenSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guangzhou University, No. 230, West Waihuan Road, Higher Education Mega Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510006, China.
Guangzhou University · CNAnshan Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chelant-enhanced phytoextraction method has been put forward as an effective soil remediation method, whereas the heavy metal leaching could not be ignored. In this study, a cropping-leaching experiment, using soil columns, was applied to study the metal leaching variations during assisted phytoextraction of Cd- and Pb-polluted soils, using seedlings of Zea mays, applying three different chelators (EDTA, EDDS, and rhamnolipid), and artificial rainfall (acid rainfall or normal rainfall). It showed that artificial rainfall, especially artificial acid rain, after chelator application led to the increase of heavy metals in the leaching solution. EDTA increased both Cd and Pb concentrations in the leaching solution, obviously, whereas EDDS and rhamnolipid increased Cd concentration but not Pb. The amount of Cd and Pb decreased as the leaching solution increased, the patterns as well matched LRMs (linear regression models), with R-square (R

Indexed as

Acid RainBiodegradation, EnvironmentalChelating AgentsEdetic AcidEnvironmental Restoration and RemediationEthylenediaminesGlycolipidsMetals, HeavySeedlingsSoil PollutantsSuccinatesZea maysAcid RainChelating AgentsEdetic AcidEthylenediaminesGlycolipidsMetals, HeavyN,N'-ethylenediamine disuccinic acidrhamnolipidSoil PollutantsSuccinatesEDDSEDTALeaching variationPhytoextraction methodRhamnolipidZea mays L.

Identifiers

PMID28895025
OpenAlexW2754695684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.