Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28894904›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2018

Factors influencing the outcome of surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.

Katja Stenström Bohlin, Maud Ankardal, Emil Nüssler, Håkan Lindkvist, Ian Milsom

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Katja Stenström BohlinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, SE-416 85, Gothenburg, Sweden. katja.bohlin@vgregion.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9064-8454
Maud AnkardalDepartment of Gynecology, Halland Hospital, Halmstad, Sweden.
Emil NüsslerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Håkan LindkvistDepartment of Mathematics and Mathematical Statistics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Ian MilsomDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, SE-416 85, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Umeå University · SEUniversity of Gothenburg · SEHallands sjukhus Halmstad · SE

Funding

National LUA/ALF grant 11315
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisPelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery is a common gynecological procedure. Our aim was to assess the influence of obesity and other risk factors on the outcome of anterior and posterior colporrhaphy with and without mesh.

methodsData were retrieved from the Swedish National Register for Gynecological Surgery on 18,554 women undergoing primary and repeat POP surgery without concomitant urinary incontinence (UI) surgery between 2006 and 2015. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent risk factors for a sensation of a vaginal bulge, de novo UI, and residual UI 1 year after surgery.

resultsThe overall subjective cure rate 1 year after surgery was 80% (with mesh 86.4% vs 77.3% without mesh, p < 0.001). The complication rate was low, but was more frequent in repeat surgery that were mainly mesh related. The use of mesh was also associated with more frequent de novo UI, but patient satisfaction and cure rates were higher compared with surgery without mesh. Preoperative sensation of a vaginal bulge, severe postoperative complications, anterior colporrhaphy, prior hysterectomy, postoperative infections, local anesthesia, and body mass index (BMI) ≥30 were risk factors for sensation of a vaginal bulge 1 year postsurgery. Obesity had no effect on complication rates but was associated increased urinary incontinence (UI) after primary surgery. Obesity had no influence on cure or voiding status in women undergoing repeat surgery.

conclusionsObesity had an impact on the sensation of a vaginal bulge and the presence of UI after primary surgery but not on complications.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGynecologic Surgical ProceduresHumansMiddle AgedObesityPatient SatisfactionPelvic Organ ProlapsePostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesRegistriesReoperationRisk FactorsSurgical MeshBody mass indexMeshObesityPelvic organ prolapsePostoperative complicationsUrinary incontinence

Identifiers

PMID28894904
PMCPMC5754405
OpenAlexW2756029689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.