Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28894850›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of breast health2017

Cost-Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening in Turkey, a Developing Country: Results from Bahçeşehir Mammography Screening Project.

Vahit Özmen, Sibel Ö Gürdal, Neslihan Cabioğlu, Beyza Özcinar, A Nilüfer Özaydın, Arda Kayhan, Erkin Arıbal, Cennet Sahin, Pınar Saip, Oğuzhan Alagöz

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of breast health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Surgical Highlights from the 40European journal of breast health · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Vahit ÖzmenDepartment of Surgery, İstanbul Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul University, İstanbul, Turkey.
Sibel Ö GürdalDepartments of Surgery, Namık Kemal University School of Medicine, Tekirdağ, Turkey.
Neslihan CabioğluDepartment of Surgery, İstanbul Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul University, İstanbul, Turkey.
Beyza ÖzcinarDepartment of Surgery, İstanbul Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul University, İstanbul, Turkey.
A Nilüfer ÖzaydınDepartment of Public Health, Marmara University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Arda KayhanDepartments of Radiology, University Health Sciences, İstanbul Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
Erkin ArıbalDepartment of Radiology, Marmara University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Cennet SahinDepartment of Radiology, University Health Sciences, İstanbul Şisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
Pınar SaipDepartment of Medical Oncology, İstanbul University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Oğuzhan AlagözDepartment of Industrial & Systems Engineering and Population Health Sciences, UW Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI, USA.
Istanbul University · TRMarmara University · TRİstanbul Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRNamık Kemal University · TRŞişli Etfal Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRUW Health University Hospital · US

Funding

Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2012 to 2016
$32.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000427
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe used the results from the first three screening rounds of Bahcesehir Mammography Screening Project (BMSP), a 10-year (2009-2019) and the first organized population-based screening program implemented in a county of Istanbul, Turkey, to assess the potential cost-effectiveness of a population-based mammography screening program in Turkey. MATERIALS AND

methodsTwo screening strategies were compared: BMSP (includes three biennial screens for women between 40-69) and Turkish National Breast Cancer Registry Program (TNBCRP) which includes no organized population-based screening. Costs were estimated using direct data from the BMSP project and the reimbursement rates of Turkish Social Security Administration. The life-years saved by BMSP were estimated using the stage distribution observed with BMSP and TNBCRP.

resultsA total of 67 women (out of 7234 screened women) were diagnosed with breast cancer in BMSP. The stage distribution for AJCC stages O, I, II, III, IV was 19.4%, 50.8%, 20.9%, 7.5%, 1.5% and 4.9%, 26.6%, 44.9%, 20.8%, 2.8% with BMSP and TNBCRP, respectively. The BMSP program is expected to save 279.46 life years over TNBCRP with an additional cost of $677.171, which implies an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $2.423 per saved life year. Since the ICER is smaller than the Gross Demostic Product (GDP) per capita in Turkey ($10.515 in 2014), BMSP program is highly cost-effective and remains cost-effective in the sensitivity analysis.

conclusionMammography screening may change the stage distribution of breast cancer in Turkey. Furthermore, an organized population-based screening program may be cost-effective in Turkey and in other developing countries. More research is needed to better estimate life-years saved with screening and further validate the findings of our study.

Indexed as

breast cancer screening Turkeycost-effectiveness of breast cancer screeningMammography screening

Identifiers

PMID28894850
PMCPMC5544145
OpenAlexW2729473095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.