Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28894816›Full record

ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2016

Evaluation of peripheral nerve regeneration through biomaterial conduits via micro-CT imaging.

Sarah K Pixley, Tracy M Hopkins, Kevin J Little, David B Hom

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah K PixleyDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Physiology (S.K.P., T.M.H.) Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center Cincinnati Ohio U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0003-2713-4263
Tracy M HopkinsDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Physiology (S.K.P., T.M.H.) Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center Cincinnati Ohio U.S.A.
Kevin J LittlePediatric Hand and Upper Extremity Center (K.J.L.), Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center Cincinnati Ohio U.S.A.
David B HomDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (D.B.H.) University of Cincinnati School of Medicine Cincinnati Ohio U.S.A.
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USUniversity of Cincinnati · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveHollow nerve conduits made of natural or synthetic biomaterials are used clinically to aid regeneration of peripheral nerves damaged by trauma or disease. To support healing, conduit lumen patency must be maintained until recovery occurs. New methods to study conduit structural integrity would provide an important means to optimize conduits in preclinical studies. We explored a novel combined technique to examine structural integrity of two types of nerve conduits after in vivo healing. STUDY

designMicro-CT imaging with iodine contrast was combined with histological analysis to examine two different nerve conduits after in vivo nerve reconstruction in rats. MATERIALS AND

methodsSciatic nerve gaps in adult Lewis rats were reconstructed with poly(caprolactone) (PCL, 1.6 cm gap, 14-week survival) or silicone (1 cm gap, 6-week survival) conduits (N = 12 total). Conduits with regenerating tissues were imaged by micro-CT with iodine contrast and compared to the histology (hematoxylin and eosin, immunostaining for axons) of regenerated tissues after iodine removal.

resultsPCL nerve conduits showed extensive breakage throughout their length, but all showed successful nerve growth through the conduits. The silicone conduits remained intact, although significant constriction was uniquely detected by micro-CT, with 1 of 6 animals showing incomplete tissue regeneration.

conclusionsMicro-CT with iodine contrast offers a unique and valuable means to determine 3D structural integrity of nerve conduits and nerve healing following reconstruction. Furthermore, this paper shows that even if conduit compression and degradation occur, nerve regeneration can still take place.

Indexed as

biomaterial implantscontrast agentmicro‐CTnerve conduitsnerve repairperipheral nerve regenerationrat

Identifiers

PMID28894816
PMCPMC5510275
OpenAlexW2556003776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.