ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2016
Factors affecting revision rate of chronic rhinosinusitis.
Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Factors Affecting the Control of Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps: A Comparison in Patients With or Without NERD.Allergy & rhinology (Providence, R.I.)Trial
- Personalizing sinus surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and genetic predictors of outcome in chronic rhinosinusitis.Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons · 2026Review
- Recurrence of Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps After Surgery: Risk Factors, Predictive Models, and Treatment Approaches with a Focus on Western and Asian Differences.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Radiological score, asthma and NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease predict relapsing chronic rhinosinusitis.Clinical and translational allergy · 2025Article
- The Clinical Outcome of Image-Guided System in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery for Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2025Review
- Predictors of revision endoscopic sinus surgery in Finnish patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.Clinical and translational allergy · 2025Article
- Dupilumab Improves Facial Pain and Reduces Rescue Treatments in Patients with CRSwNP and Recalcitrant Frontal Sinusitis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Phenotypic associations of medical polypectomy and revision surgery following endoscopic sinus surgery: a retrospective study of a single-centre experience in Scotland.The Journal of laryngology and otology · 2023Review
- How to manage recurrences after surgery in CRSwNP patients in the biologic era: a narrative review.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2023Review
- The burden of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and its relation to asthma in Finland.Clinical and translational allergy · 2022Article
- Radiological score of computed tomography scans predicts revision surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2022Article
- Factors Associated with Revision Sinus Surgery in Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Using machine learning for the personalised prediction of revision endoscopic sinus surgery.PloS one · 2022Article
- Factors affecting upper airway control of NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease: A real-world study of 167 patients.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2021Article
- The Nose as a Route for Therapy: Part 1. Pharmacotherapy.Frontiers in allergy · 2021Review
- Glucocorticoid receptor isoform expression in peripheral blood mononuclear leukocytes of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2018Article
- Revision rates and time to revision following endoscopic sinus surgery: A large database analysis.The Laryngoscope · 2018Article
- Assessing Cut-off Points of Eosinophils, Nasal Polyp, and Lund-Mackay Scores to Predict Surgery in Nasal Polyposis: A Real-World Study.Allergy & rhinology (Providence, R.I.)Article
- Older Age Is Associated With Better Compliance With Follow-up in Taiwan After Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveChronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a variable multifactorial disease. It can be divided into forms with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and without (CRSsNP). Sinus and/or nasal polypectomy surgery are considered if maximal conservative treatment is insufficient. The predictive factors of the need of revision surgery comprise mostly the CRSwNP phenotype and are not fully understood. STUDY
designThe aim of this follow-up study was to evaluate the factors associated with the revision surgery rate in CRS patients with variable extent of disease.
methodsData of CRS patients (N = 178) undergoing sinus surgery and/or nasal polypectomy in 2001 to 2010 were used. Patient characteristics and follow-up data were collected from patient records and questionnaires. Associations were analyzed by Fisher's exact, Mann Whitney U, and the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test. Unadjusted Cox's proportional hazard models were used for 12 variables and were fitted for the need for revision sinus surgery and/or nasal polypectomy during follow-up of in average 9 years.
resultsThe proportion of CRS patients who had undergone revision in 5 years was 9.6%. After adjustment, the following factors associated significantly with the need for recurrent CRS surgery: allergic rhinitis, corticosteroid treatment, previous surgery of CRS, and recurrent NP.
conclusionIncreased risk of progressive CRS phenotypes with the need for revision surgery would putatively be recognized by relatively simple clinical questions. Further studies with increased sample size are needed to evaluate whether these predictive factors would be relevant for developing better detection and management of progressive CRS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2b.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.