ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2017
Mechanical behavior of polymer-based
Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 109 citations in OpenAlex.
- Structural and Mechanical Durability Evaluation of PLLA Scaffolds for Biomedical Applications.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Auxetic Stents as a Next Generation Solution for Vascular Diseases-A Review.Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2026Review
- Article
- Deployable 3D-Printed Vascular Stent with Surface-Catalysed Endogenous Nitric Oxide Generation.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Article
- Constructing a Concentric GO Network via Rotational Extrusion for Synergistic Axial-Hoop Mechanics in Polymer Microtubes.Polymers · 2026Article
- Evolution of Coronary Stents: From Birth to Future Trends.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Evaluation of expansion and crossing profile characteristics of micro laser powder bed fusion-manufactured coronary stents in a rat model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Electrospinning PLLA/PCL Blend Fibre-Based Materials and Their Biomedical Application: A Mini Review.Polymers · 2025Review
- From Bench Testing to Virtual Implantation: A Comparative Study Between Poly-l-Lactic Acid and Nickel-Titanium Braided Stents.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Evaluating Polylactic Acid and Basalt Fibre Composites as a Potential Bioabsorbable Stent Material.Polymers · 2025Article
- Research progress on risk factors for in-stent restenosis following cerebrovascular stent implantation.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- A novel paclitaxel eluting bioresorbable vascular stent with a super flexible stent structure and round cross section struts fabricated using 3D printing technology with a rotating platform.Regenerative biomaterials · 2025Article
- Polydiolcitrate-MoSACS applied materials & interfaces · 2024Article
- Evaluation of coronary stents: A review of types, materials, processing techniques, design, and problems.Heliyon · 2023Review
- A Review of the Release Profiles and Efficacies of Chemotherapy Drug-Loaded Electrospun Membranes.Polymers · 2023Review
- Bioresorbable vascular metallic scaffolds: Current status and research trends.Current opinion in biomedical engineering · 2022Article
- Systems, Properties, Surface Modification and Applications of Biodegradable Magnesium-Based Alloys: A Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Poly-l-Lactic Acid (PLLA)-Based Biomaterials for Regenerative Medicine: A Review on Processing and Applications.Polymers · 2022Review
- 3D Printing of Polymeric Bioresorbable Stents: A Strategy to Improve Both Cellular Compatibility and Mechanical Properties.Polymers · 2022Review
- Sirolimus Release from Biodegradable Polymers for Coronary Stent Application: A Review.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) were developed to overcome the drawbacks of current metallic drug-eluting stents (DES), such as late in-stent restenosis and caging of the vessel permanently. The concept of the BRS is to provide transient support to the vessel during healing before being degraded and resorbed by the body, freeing the vessel and restoring vasomotion. The mechanical properties of the BRS are influenced by the choice of the material and processing methods. Due to insufficient radial strength of the bioresorbable material, BRS often required large strut profile as compared to conventional metallic DES. Having thick struts will in turn affect the deliverability of the device and may cause flow disturbance, thereby increasing the incidence of acute thrombotic events. Currently, the bioresorbable poly-l-lactic acid (PLLA) polymer and magnesium (Mg) alloys are being investigated as materials in BRS technologies. The bioresorption process, mechanical properties,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.