Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28894360›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2017

The evaluation of β-adrenoceptor blocking agents in patients with COPD and congestive heart failure: a nationwide study.

Kuang-Ming Liao, Tien-Yu Lin, Yaw-Bin Huang, Chen-Chun Kuo, Chung-Yu Chen

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Appraisal of β-Blocker Use in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Exploring the kinetic selectivity of drugs targeting the βPharmacology research & perspectives · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Beta-blocker Use in Moderate and Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina) · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kuang-Ming Liao *Department of Internal Medicine, Chi Mei Medical Center, Chiali, Tainan.
Tien-Yu LinSchool of Pharmacy, Kaohsiung Medical University.
Yaw-Bin HuangSchool of Pharmacy, Kaohsiung Medical University.
Chen-Chun Kuo *School of Pharmacy, Kaohsiung Medical University.
Chung-Yu ChenSchool of Pharmacy, Kaohsiung Medical University.
Kaohsiung Medical University · TWChi Mei Medical Center · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveβ-Blockers are safe and improve survival in patients with both congestive heart failure (CHF) and COPD. However, the superiority of different types of β-blockers is still unclear among patients with CHF and COPD. The association between β-blockers and CHF exacerbation as well as COPD exacerbation remains unclear. The objective of this study was to compare the outcome of different β-blockers in patients with concurrent CHF and COPD. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe used the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan to conduct a retrospective cohort study. The inclusion criteria for CHF were patients who were >20 years old and were diagnosed with CHF between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2012. COPD patients included those who had outpatient visit claims ≥2 times within 365 days or 1 claim for hospitalization with a COPD diagnosis. A time-dependent Cox proportional hazards regression model was applied to evaluate the effectiveness of β-blockers in the study population.

resultsWe identified 1,872 patients with concurrent CHF and COPD. Only high-dose bisoprolol significantly reduced the risk of death and slightly decreased the hospitalization rate due to CHF exacerbation (death: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] =0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] =0.29-0.89; hospitalization rate due to CHF exacerbation: aHR =0.48, 95% CI =0.23-1.00). No association was observed between β-blocker use and COPD exacerbation.

conclusionIn patients with concurrent CHF and COPD, β-blockers reduced mortality, CHF exacerbation, and the need for hospitalization. Bisoprolol was found to reduce mortality and CHF exacerbation compared to carvedilol and metoprolol.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-AntagonistsAgedAged, 80 and overBisoprololCarbazolesCarvedilolChi-Square DistributionDatabases, FactualDisease ProgressionFemaleHeart FailureHospitalizationHumansMaleMetoprololMiddle AgedAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsBisoprololCarbazolesCarvedilolMetoprololPropanolaminesacute exacerbationcongestive heart failureCOPDβ-blockers

Identifiers

PMID28894360
PMCPMC5584777
OpenAlexW2746422204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.