Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28894213›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Ultraviolet Radiation-Induced Production of Nitric Oxide:A multi-cell and multi-donor analysis.

Graham Holliman, Donna Lowe, Howard Cohen, Sarah Felton, Ken Raj

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects of ultraviolet light exposure on blood pressure: a systematic review.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. State-of-the-art and current challenges for TiOEnvironmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Graham HollimanRadiation Effects Department, Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards,Public Health England (PHE), Chilton, Oxfordshire, OX11 0RQ, United Kingdom. Graham.Holliman@phe.gov.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-2097-530X
Donna LoweRadiation Effects Department, Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards,Public Health England (PHE), Chilton, Oxfordshire, OX11 0RQ, United Kingdom.
Howard CohenElizabeth House, 515 Limpsfield Road, Warlingham, Surrey, CR6 9LF, United Kingdom.
Sarah FeltonOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Old Road, Oxford, OX3 7LJ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3304-0490
Ken RajRadiation Effects Department, Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards,Public Health England (PHE), Chilton, Oxfordshire, OX11 0RQ, United Kingdom.
Public Health England · GBOxford University Hospitals NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing evidence regarding positive effects of exposure to sunlight has led to suggestions that current advice may be overly weighted in favour of avoidance. UV-A has been reported to lower blood pressure, possibly through nitric oxide (NO) production in skin. Here, we set out to investigate effects of UV-A and solar-simulated radiation on the potential source of dermal NO, the effective doses and wavelengths, the responsiveness of different human skin cells, the magnitude of inter-individual differences and the potential influence of age. We utilised isogenic keratinocytes, microvascular endothelial cells, melanocytes and fibroblasts isolated from 36 human skins ranging from neonates to 86 years old. We show that keratinocytes and microvascular endothelial cells show greatest NO release following biologically relevant doses of UV-A. This was consistent across multiple neonatal donors and the effect is maintained in adult keratinocytes. Our observations are consistent with a bi-phasic mechanism by which UV-A can trigger vasodilatory effects. Analyses of NO-production spectra adds further evidence that nitrites in skin cells are the source of UV-mediated NO release. These potentially positive effects of ultraviolet radiation lend support for objective assessment of environmental influence on human health and the idea of "healthy sun exposure".

Indexed as

Ultraviolet RaysAgedAged, 80 and overDNA DamageFemaleFibroblastsForeskinHumansKeratinocytesMaleMelanocytesMiddle AgedMyocytes, Smooth MuscleNitric OxideSkinSunlightNitric Oxide

Identifiers

PMID28894213
PMCPMC5593895
OpenAlexW2752053109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.