Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28893999›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

Cortically coordinated NREM thalamocortical oscillations play an essential, instructive role in visual system plasticity.

Jaclyn Durkin, Aneesha K Suresh, Julie Colbath, Christopher Broussard, Jiaxing Wu, Michal Zochowski, Sara J Aton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. microRNA-218-5p coordinates scaling of excitatory and inhibitory synapses during homeostatic synaptic plasticity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Electrophysiological Signatures of Visual Recognition Memory across All Layers of Mouse V1.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jaclyn DurkinNeuroscience Graduate Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.ORCID 0000-0002-0618-626X
Aneesha K SureshCommittee on Computational Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637.
Julie ColbathDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.
Christopher BroussardInformation Technology Advocacy and Research Support, College of Literature, Science, and the Arts, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.
Jiaxing WuProgram in Applied Physics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.
Michal ZochowskiProgram in Biophysics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.
Sara J AtonDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; saton@umich.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2921-0509

Funding

Thalamocortical and corticocortical mechanisms for sleep-dependent visual learningR01NS104776 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ATON, SARA J · 2018 to 2022
$1.9M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS104776
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two long-standing questions in neuroscience are how sleep promotes brain plasticity and why some forms of plasticity occur preferentially during sleep vs. wake. Establishing causal relationships between specific features of sleep (e.g., network oscillations) and sleep-dependent plasticity has been difficult. Here we demonstrate that presentation of a novel visual stimulus (a single oriented grating) causes immediate, instructive changes in the firing of mouse lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) neurons, leading to increased firing-rate responses to the presented stimulus orientation (relative to other orientations). However, stimulus presentation alone does not affect primary visual cortex (V1) neurons, which show response changes only after a period of subsequent sleep. During poststimulus nonrapid eye movement (NREM) sleep, LGN neuron overall spike-field coherence (SFC) with V1 delta (0.5-4 Hz) and spindle (7-15 Hz) oscillations increased, with neurons most responsive to the presented stimulus showing greater SFC. To test whether coherent communication between LGN and V1 was essential for cortical plasticity, we first tested the role of layer 6 corticothalamic (CT) V1 neurons in coherent firing within the LGN-V1 network. We found that rhythmic optogenetic activation of CT V1 neurons dramatically induced coherent firing in LGN neurons and, to a lesser extent, in V1 neurons in the other cortical layers. Optogenetic interference with CT feedback to LGN during poststimulus NREM sleep (but not REM or wake) disrupts coherence between LGN and V1 and also blocks sleep-dependent response changes in V1. We conclude that NREM oscillations relay information regarding prior sensory experience between the thalamus and cortex to promote cortical plasticity.

Indexed as

AnimalsEye MovementsFemaleGeniculate BodiesMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsPhotic StimulationRenshaw CellsSleepThalamusVisual Cortexcoherenceplasticitysleepthalamocorticalvision

Identifiers

PMID28893999
PMCPMC5625927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.