ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2017
Take your PIKK: tumour viruses and DNA damage response pathways.
Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- The interaction between virus-bound KLF4 and host-bound PARP1 directs the localization of wild-type adeno-associated virus type 2 (wtAAV2) to cellular sites of DNA damage.Journal of virology · 2026Article
- Molecular Mimics: How Viral Genomes Dupe Their Host by Usurping CTCF to Establish Infection.Viruses · 2026Review
- Association of hepatitis B virus genomes with active chromatin hubs challenges host replication fidelity, leading to DNA damage.Journal of virology · 2025Article
- Adeno-Associated Virus 2 (AAV2) - Induced RPA exhaustion generates cellular DNA damage and restricts viral gene expression.PLoS pathogens · 2025Article
- Review
- How human papillomavirus (HPV) targets DNA repair pathways for viral replication: from guardian to accomplice.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2025Review
- Polymerase theta is a synthetic lethal target for killing Epstein-Barr virus lymphomas.Journal of virology · 2024Article
- SARS-CoV-2 and the DNA damage response.The Journal of general virology · 2023Review
- The DNA Damage Sensor MRE11 Regulates Efficient Replication of the Autonomous Parvovirus Minute Virus of Mice.Journal of virology · 2023Article
- The Autonomous Parvovirus Minute Virus of Mice Localizes to Cellular Sites of DNA Damage Using ATR Signaling.Viruses · 2023Article
- Genomes of the autonomous parvovirus minute virus of mice induce replication stress through RPA exhaustion.PLoS pathogens · 2023Article
- Nuclear antiviral innate responses at the intersection of DNA sensing and DNA repair.Trends in microbiology · 2022Review
- ATM-Dependent Phosphorylation of Hepatitis B Core Protein in Response to Genotoxic Stress.Viruses · 2021Article
- Adenovirus Remodeling of the Host Proteome and Host Factors Associated with Viral Genomes.mSystems · 2021Article
- Predicted Cellular Interactors of the Endogenous Retrovirus-K Integrase Enzyme.Microorganisms · 2021Article
- Human papillomavirus E6 and E7: What remains?Tumour virus research · 2021Review
- Antiviral drug screen identifies DNA-damage response inhibitor as potent blocker of SARS-CoV-2 replication.Cell reports · 2021Article
- Novel modulators of p53-signaling encoded by unknown genes of emerging viruses.PLoS pathogens · 2021Article
- Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Viruses regulate cellular processes to facilitate viral replication. Manipulation of nuclear proteins and pathways by nuclear replicating viruses often causes cellular genome instability that contributes to transformation. The cellular DNA damage response (DDR) safeguards the host to maintain genome integrity, but DNA tumour viruses can manipulate the DDR to promote viral propagation. In this review, we describe the interactions of DNA tumour viruses with the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-like protein kinase (PIKK) pathways, which are central regulatory arms of the DDR. We review how signalling through the ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM), ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3 related (ATR), and DNA-dependent protein kinases (DNA-PK) influences viral life cycles, and how their manipulation by viral proteins may contribute to tumour formation.This article is part of the themed issue 'Human oncogenic viruses'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.