ArticleCMAJ open2017
Accuracy and predictive value of incarcerated adults' accounts of their self-harm histories: findings froman Australian prospective data linkage study.
Article in CMAJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk factors for self-harm in prison: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The lancet. Psychiatry · 2020Pooled it
- Elevated Negative Affectivity and Psychoticism in individuals with active Nonsuicidal Self-Injury (NSSI) compared with individuals with previous or no NSSI.Borderline personality disorder and emotion dysregulation · 2026Article
- Understanding healthcare utilisation for aboriginal people in New South Wales prisons with histories of self-harm and suicidal behaviour: a retrospective cohort study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Self-harm before and during imprisonment: cohort study of males in prison linking population-based routinely collected data in Wales.BJPsych open · 2025Article
- Understanding Verbal Violence Perpetration Among Intimate Partner Stalkers Using Police-Identified Psychological Distress and Drug Use.Criminal behaviour and mental health : CBMH · 2025Article
- Maternal incarceration increases the risk of self-harm but not suicide: a matched cohort study.Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences · 2023Article
- Using the stress-vulnerability model to better understand suicide in prison populations.Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law · 2023Article
- Is ceasing self-injury enough? Differences in psychological health between people reporting behavioral cessation of non-suicidal self-injury and those who consider themselves to have stopped self-injuring.Journal of clinical psychology · 2023Article
- Advancing cross-sectoral data linkage to understand and address the health impacts of social exclusion: Challenges and potential solutions.International journal of population data science · 2023Article
- Leveraging data science to enhance suicide prevention research: a literature review.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2022Review
- Interventions to reduce suicidal thoughts and behaviours among people in contact with the criminal justice system: A global systematic review.EClinicalMedicine · 2022Review
- Clinical Characteristics and Self-Harm in Forensic Psychiatric Patients.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Article
- Development of a Self-Harm Monitoring System for Victoria.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- One-Year Consistency in Lifetime Frequency Estimates and Functions of Non-Suicidal Self-Injury in a Clinical Sample.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2020Article
- Self-harm in the Australian asylum seeker population: A national records-based study.SSM - population health · 2019Article
- Assessing the predictability of self-harm in a high-risk adult prisoner population: a prospective cohort study.Health & justice · 2018Article
- Self-harm and suicidal behaviour among incarcerated adults in the Australian Capital Territory.Health & justice · 2018Article
- Understanding and Improving the Health of People Who Experience Incarceration: An Overview and Synthesis.Epidemiologic reviews · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSelf-harm is prevalent in prison populations and is a well-established risk factor for suicide. Researchers typically rely on self-report to measure self-harm, yet the accuracy and predictive value of self-report in prison populations is unclear. Using a large, representative sample of incarcerated men and women, we aimed to examine the level of agreement between self-reported self-harm history and historical medical records, and investigate the association between self-harm history and medically verified self-harm after release from prison.
methodsDuring confidential interviews with 1315 adults conducted within 6 weeks of expected release from 1 of 7 prisons in Queensland, Australia, participants were asked about the occurrence of lifetime self-harm. Responses were compared with prison medical records and linked both retrospectively and prospectively with ambulance, emergency department and hospital records to identify instances of medically verified self-harm. Follow-up interviews roughly 1, 3 and 6 months after release covered the same domains assessed in the baseline interview as well as self-reported criminal activity and contact with health care, social and criminal justice services since release.
resultsAgreement between self-reported and medically verified history of self-harm was poor, with 64 (37.6%) of 170 participants with a history of medically verified self-harm disclosing a history of self-harm at baseline. Participants with a medically verified history of self-harm were more likely than other participants to self-harm during the follow-up period. Compared to the unconfirmed-negative group, the true-positive (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 6.2 [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.3-10.4]), false-negative (adjusted HR 4.0 [95% CI 2.2-6.7]) and unconfirmed-positive (adjusted HR 2.2 [95% CI 1.2-3.9]) groups were at increased risk for self-harm after release from prison.
interpretationSelf-reported history of self-harm should not be considered a sensitive indicator of prior self-harm or of future self-harm risk in incarcerated adults. To identify those who should be targeted for preventive strategies, triangulation of data from multiple verifiable sources should be performed whenever possible.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.