Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28893817›Full record

ArticleAnnals of family medicine2017

Preventable Emergency Hospital Admissions Among Adults With Intellectual Disability in England.

Fay J Hosking, Iain M Carey, Stephen DeWilde, Tess Harris, Carole Beighton, Derek G Cook

Erratum issuedOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of family medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fay J HoskingPopulation Health Research Institute, St George's University of London, United Kingdom.
Iain M CareyPopulation Health Research Institute, St George's University of London, United Kingdom i.carey@sgul.ac.uk.
Stephen DeWildePopulation Health Research Institute, St George's University of London, United Kingdom.
Tess HarrisPopulation Health Research Institute, St George's University of London, United Kingdom.
Carole BeightonPopulation Health Research Institute, St George's University of London, United Kingdom.
Derek G CookPopulation Health Research Institute, St George's University of London, United Kingdom.
St George's, University of London · GB

Funding

Department of Health 12/64/154
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAdults with intellectual disabilities experience poorer physical health and health care quality, but there is limited information on the potential for reducing emergency hospital admissions in this population. We describe overall and preventable emergency admissions for adults with vs without intellectual disabilities in England and assess differences in primary care management before admission for 2 common ambulatory care-sensitive conditions (ACSCs).

methodsWe used electronic records to study a cohort of 16,666 adults with intellectual disabilities and 113,562 age-, sex-, and practice-matched adults without intellectual disabilities from 343 English family practices. Incident rate ratios (IRRs) from conditional Poisson regression were analyzed for all emergency and preventable emergency admissions. Primary care management of lower respiratory tract infections and urinary tract infections, as exemplar ACSCs, before admission were compared in unmatched analysis between adults with and without intellectual disabilities.

resultsThe overall rate for emergency admissions for adults with vs without intellectual disabilities was 182 vs 68 per 1,000 per year (IRR = 2.82; 95% CI, 2.66-2.98). ACSCs accounted for 33.7% of emergency admissions among the former compared with 17.3% among the latter (IRR = 5.62; 95% CI, 5.14-6.13); adjusting for comorbidity, smoking, and deprivation did not fully explain the difference (IRR = 3.60; 95% CI, 3.25-3.99). Although adults with intellectual disability were at nearly 5 times higher risk for admission for lower respiratory tract infections and urinary tract infections, they had similar primary care use, investigation, and management before admission as the general population.

conclusionsAdults with intellectual disabilities are at high risk for preventable emergency admissions. Identifying strategies for better detecting and managing ACSCs, including lower respiratory and urinary tract infections, in primary care could reduce hospitalizations.

Indexed as

Intellectual DisabilityAdultCase-Control StudiesEmergency Service, HospitalEnglandFemaleHumansMaleMedical OverusePatient AdmissionPersons with Intellectual Disabilitiesacute hospitalizationambulatory care sensitive conditionsintellectual disabilitypractice-based researchprimary care

Identifiers

PMID28893817
PMCPMC5593730
OpenAlexW2755245778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.