ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2017
GPs' perceptions of resilience training: a qualitative study.
Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- 'Death on an industrial scale'- general practice trainees' perceptions and experiences of dying and death during covid-19: an interpretative phenomenological analysis.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Does a GP service package matter in addressing the absence of health management by the occupational population? A modelling study.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Unpacking the Experiences of Health Care Professionals About the Web-Based Building Resilience At Work Program During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Framework Analysis.JMIR medical education · 2024Article
- Mental health of general practitioners in Chongqing, China during COVID-19: a cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2023Article
- The professional resilience of mid-career GPs in the UK: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022Article
- Can we prepare healthcare professionals and students for involvement in stressful healthcare events? A mixed-methods evaluation of a resilience training intervention.BMC health services research · 2020Article
- Burnout, resilience, and perception of mindfulness programmes among GP trainees: a mixed-methods study.BJGP open · 2020Article
- Comparing family medicine residency training in Canada and the United Kingdom.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2019Article
- Mindfulness intervention for foundation year doctors: a feasibility study.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGPs are reporting increasing levels of burnout, stress, and job dissatisfaction, and there is a looming GP shortage. Promoting resilience is a key strategy for enhancing the sustainability of the healthcare workforce and improving patient care.
aimTo explore GPs' perspectives on the content, context, and acceptability of resilience training programmes in general practice, in order to build more effective GP resilience programmes. DESIGN AND
settingThis was a qualitative study of the perspectives of GPs currently practising in England.
methodGPs were recruited through convenience sampling, and data were collected from two focus groups (
resultsParticipants perceived resilience training to be potentially of value in ameliorating workplace stresses. Nevertheless, uncertainty was expressed regarding how best to provide training for stressed GPs who have limited time. Participants suspected that GPs most likely to benefit from resilience training were the least likely to engage, as stress and being busy worked against engagement. Conflicting views were expressed about the most suitable training delivery method for promoting better engagement. Participants also emphasised that training should not only place the focus on the individual, but also focus on organisation issues.
conclusionA multimodal, flexible approach based on individual needs and learning aims, including resilience workshops within undergraduate training and in individual practices, is likely to be the optimal way to promote resilience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.