Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28893757›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2017

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of duloxetine added to usual care for patients with chronic pain due to hip or knee osteoarthritis: protocol of a pragmatic open-label cluster randomised trial (the DUO trial).

Jacoline J van den Driest, Dieuwke Schiphof, Pim A J Luijsterburg, Aafke R Koffeman, Marc A Koopmanschap, Patrick J E Bindels, Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jacoline J van den DriestDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Dieuwke SchiphofDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Pim A J LuijsterburgDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Aafke R KoffemanDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/3, 3, 3, 3, 3
Marc A KoopmanschapDepartment of Health Policy and Management/iMTA, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Patrick J E BindelsDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Sita M A Bierma-ZeinstraDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOsteoarthritis (OA) is a highly prevalent painful condition of the musculoskeletal system. The effectiveness of current analgesic options has proven to be limited and improved analgesic treatment is needed. Several randomised placebo-controlled trials have now demonstrated the efficacy of duloxetine, an antidepressant with a centrally acting effect, in the treatment of OA pain. The aim of the current study is to investigate if duloxetine is effective and cost-effective as a third-choice analgesic added to usual care for treating chronic pain compared with usual care alone in general practice. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A pragmatic open, cluster randomised trial is conducted. Patients with pain due to hip or knee OA on most days of the past 3 months with insufficient benefit of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or contraindications or intolerable side effects are included. General practices are randomised to either (1) duloxetine and usual care or (2) usual care only. Primary outcome is pain at 3 months measured on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale. Secondary outcomes at 3 months and 1 year are pain (WOMAC, at 1 year), function (WOMAC), adverse reactions, quality of life and modification of the response to treatment by the presence of centrally sensitised pain (modified PainDETECT). At 1 year, medical and productivity costs will be assessed. Analyses will be performed following the intention-to-treat principle taking the cluster design into account. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study is approved by the local Medical Ethics Committee (2015-293). Results will be published in a scientific peer-reviewed journal and will be communicated at conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Dutch Trial Registry(ntr4798); Pre-results.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisAdolescentAdultAntidepressive AgentsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalChronic PainDuloxetine HydrochlorideFemaleHipHip JointHumansJointsKneeKnee JointMaleMusculoskeletal PainAntidepressive AgentsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalDuloxetine Hydrochlorideclinical trialspain managementprimary carerheumatology

Identifiers

PMID28893757
PMCPMC5595178
OpenAlexW2759657619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.