ArticleReproductive health2017
Preference for cesarean section in young nulligravid women in eight OECD countries and implications for reproductive health education.
Article in Reproductive health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Women's and communities' views of targeted educational interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean section: a qualitative evidence synthesis.Reproductive health · 2018Pooled it
- Effectiveness of Breathing Exercises, Foot Reflexology and Massage (BRM) on Maternal and Newborn Outcomes Among Primigravidae in Saudi Arabia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.International journal of women's health · 2022Trial
- Reproducing fear: the effect of birth stories on nulligravid women's birth preferences.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2021Trial
- Implementation of Robson's ten-group classification system for cesarean section rates at a tertiary university hospital in Egypt: a prospective study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Observational
- Article
- Navigating the depths of primiparous's birth perceptions: understanding vaginal birth through metaphors.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Addressing the Increasing Rate of Caesarean Sections in an Australian Healthcare System: A Systems Science Approach to Identify Stakeholder Perspectives.Nursing & health sciences · 2025Article
- Mode of Delivery in Greece: A Study of Obstetricians' Personal Preferences Regarding Delivery of Their Offspring.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- The impact of major congenital anomalies on obstetric outcomes in the United Arab Emirates: the Mutaba'ah Study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Women's preference for a vaginal birth in Brazilian private hospitals: effects of a quality improvement project.Reproductive health · 2024Article
- Perinatal outcomes of midwife-led care, stratified by medical risk: a retrospective cohort study from British Columbia (2008-2018).CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2023Article
- Premenstrual Syndrome and Childbirth Fear Prior to Pregnancy in Young Women: An Association and Cross-Sectional Study.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2022Article
- Cesarean delivery in Norwegian nulliparous women with singleton cephalic term births, 1967-2020: a population-based study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2022Article
- Childbirth fear, birth-related mindset and knowledge in non-pregnant women without birth experience.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2022Article
- Article
- Caesarean birth in public maternities in Argentina: a formative research study on the views of obstetricians, midwives and trainees.BMJ open · 2022Article
- The development and the psychometric evaluation of the Adolescents Intentions towards the Birth Options Scale in Greek.European journal of midwifery · 2022Article
- Pelvic floor: vaginal or caesarean delivery? A review of systematic reviews.International urogynecology journal · 2021Review
- Students' Attitudes Towards Birth Decisions.Maedica · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEfforts to reduce unnecessary Cesarean sections (CS) in high and middle income countries have focused on changing hospital cultures and policies, care provider attitudes and behaviors, and increasing women's knowledge about the benefits of vaginal birth. These strategies have been largely ineffective. Despite evidence that women have well-developed preferences for mode of delivery prior to conceiving their first child, few studies and no interventions have targeted the next generation of maternity care consumers. The objectives of the study were to identify how many women prefer Cesarean section in a hypothetical healthy pregnancy, why they prefer CS and whether women report knowledge gaps about pregnancy and childbirth that can inform educational interventions.
methodsData was collected via an online survey at colleges and universities in 8 OECD countries (Australia, Canada, Chile, England, Germany, Iceland, New Zealand, United States) in 2014/2015. Childless young men and women between 18 and 40 years of age who planned to have at least one child in the future were eligible to participate. The current analysis is focused on the attitudes of women (n = 3616); rates of CS preference across countries are compared, using a standardized cohort of women aged 18-25 years, who were born in the survey country and did not study health sciences (n = 1390).
resultsOne in ten young women in our study preferred CS, ranging from 7.6% in Iceland to 18.4% in Australia. Fear of uncontrollable labor pain and fear of physical damage were primary reasons for preferring a CS. Both fear of childbirth and preferences for CS declined as the level of confidence in women's knowledge of pregnancy and birth increased.
conclusionEducation sessions delivered online, through social media, and face-to-face using drama and stories told by peers (young women who have recently had babies) or celebrities could be designed to maximize young women's capacity to understand the physiology of labor and birth, and the range of methods available to support them in coping with labor pain and to minimize invasive procedures, therefore reducing fear of pain, bodily damage, and loss of control. The most efficacious designs and content for such education for young women and girls remains to be tested in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.