Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28893279›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2017

Biomechanics and neural control of movement, 20 years later: what have we learned and what has changed?

Andrew D Nordin, William Z Rymer, Andrew A Biewener, Andrew B Schwartz, Daofen Chen, Fay B Horak

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. When neuro-robots go wrong: A review.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrew D NordinUniversity of Florida, PO Box 116131, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA. andrew.nordin@bme.ufl.edu.
William Z RymerRehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, USA.
Andrew A BiewenerHarvard University, Cambridge, USA.
Andrew B SchwartzUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA.
Daofen ChenNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, USA.
Fay B HorakOregon Health and Science University, Portland, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We summarize content from the opening thematic session of the 20th anniversary meeting for Biomechanics and Neural Control of Movement (BANCOM). Scientific discoveries from the past 20 years of research are covered, highlighting the impacts of rapid technological, computational, and financial growth on motor control research. We discuss spinal-level communication mechanisms, relationships between muscle structure and function, and direct cortical movement representations that can be decoded in the control of neuroprostheses. In addition to summarizing the rich scientific ideas shared during the session, we reflect on research infrastructure and capacity that contributed to progress in the field, and outline unresolved issues and remaining open questions.

Indexed as

Nervous System Physiological PhenomenaBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansLocomotionMotor SkillsMovementNeural ProsthesesSpinal CordBANCOMBiomechanicsCortexLocomotionMotor controlSpinal cord

Identifiers

PMID28893279
PMCPMC5594571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.