Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28893273›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2017

Food parenting practices for 5 to 12 year old children: a concept map analysis of parenting and nutrition experts input.

Teresia M O'Connor, Louise C Mâsse, Andrew W Tu, Allison W Watts, Sheryl O Hughes, Mark R Beauchamp, Tom Baranowski, Truc Pham, Jerica M Berge, Barbara Fiese and 6 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Effects of Fruit and Vegetable Feeding Messages on Mothers and Fathers: Interactions Between Emotional State and Health Message Framing.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2019
    Trial
  5. The Comprehensive Snack Parenting Questionnaire (CSPQ): Development and Test-Retest Reliability.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Teresia M O'ConnorUSDA/ARS Children's Nutrition Research Center, Baylor College of Medicine, 1100 Bates St, Houston, TX, USA. teresiao@bcm.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3231-8481
Louise C MâsseBC Children's Hospital Research Institute, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Andrew W TuChild & Family Research Institute, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Allison W WattsDivision of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Sheryl O HughesUSDA/ARS Children's Nutrition Research Center, Baylor College of Medicine, 1100 Bates St, Houston, TX, USA.
Mark R BeauchampSchool of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Tom BaranowskiUSDA/ARS Children's Nutrition Research Center, Baylor College of Medicine, 1100 Bates St, Houston, TX, USA.
Truc PhamUSDA/ARS Children's Nutrition Research Center, Baylor College of Medicine, 1100 Bates St, Houston, TX, USA.
Jerica M BergeDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minnesota, MN, USA.
Barbara FieseFamily Resilience Center, Department of Human Development and Family Studies, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
Rebecca GolleySansom Institute for Health Research (PHRC), School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Melanie HingleDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Stef P J KremersNUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Kyung E RheeDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
Helen SkouterisSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.
Amber VaughnDepartment of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Funding

CIHR MOP-119359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParents are an important influence on children's dietary intake and eating behaviors. However, the lack of a conceptual framework and inconsistent assessment of food parenting practices limits our understanding of which food parenting practices are most influential on children. The aim of this study was to develop a food parenting practice conceptual framework using systematic approaches of literature reviews and expert input.

methodA previously completed systematic review of food parenting practice instruments and a qualitative study of parents informed the development of a food parenting practice item bank consisting of 3632 food parenting practice items. The original item bank was further reduced to 110 key food parenting concepts using binning and winnowing techniques. A panel of 32 experts in parenting and nutrition were invited to sort the food parenting practice concepts into categories that reflected their perceptions of a food parenting practice conceptual framework. Multi-dimensional scaling produced a point map of the sorted concepts and hierarchical cluster analysis identified potential solutions. Subjective modifications were used to identify two potential solutions, with additional feedback from the expert panel requested.

resultsThe experts came from 8 countries and 25 participated in the sorting and 23 provided additional feedback. A parsimonious and a comprehensive concept map were developed based on the clustering of the food parenting practice constructs. The parsimonious concept map contained 7 constructs, while the comprehensive concept map contained 17 constructs and was informed by a previously published content map for food parenting practices. Most of the experts (52%) preferred the comprehensive concept map, while 35% preferred to present both solutions.

conclusionThe comprehensive food parenting practice conceptual map will provide the basis for developing a calibrated Item Response Modeling (IRM) item bank that can be used with computerized adaptive testing. Such an item bank will allow for more consistency in measuring food parenting practices across studies to better assess the impact of food parenting practices on child outcomes and the effect of interventions that target parents as agents of change.

Indexed as

Parent-Child RelationsChildChild BehaviorChild, PreschoolDietDiet, HealthyEvaluation Studies as TopicHealth BehaviorHumansNutritional StatusParentingSurveys and QuestionnairesChildConcept mappingFamilyFoodMeasurementNutritionParentingParenting practices

Identifiers

PMID28893273
PMCPMC5594481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.