Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28893263›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2017

Evaluation of a continuous community-based ITN distribution pilot in Lainya County, South Sudan 2012-2013.

Albert Kilian, Lisa Woods Schnurr, Tafadzwa Matova, Richmond Ato Selby, Kojo Lokko, Sean Blaufuss, Miatta Zenabu Gbanya, Ruth Allan, Hannah Koenker, Martin Swaka and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Albert KilianMalaria Consortium, London, UK. albert@trophealth.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3361-7480
Lisa Woods SchnurrMalaria Consortium, Juba, South Sudan.
Tafadzwa MatovaMalaria Consortium, Juba, South Sudan.
Richmond Ato SelbyMalaria Consortium, London, UK.
Kojo LokkoJohns Hopkins University Center for Communication Programs, Baltimore, USA.
Sean BlaufussJohns Hopkins University Center for Communication Programs, Baltimore, USA.
Miatta Zenabu GbanyaMalaria Consortium, Juba, South Sudan.
Ruth AllanMalaria Consortium, Juba, South Sudan.
Hannah KoenkerJohns Hopkins University Center for Communication Programs, Baltimore, USA.
Martin SwakaPresident's Malaria Initiative, U.S. Agency for International Development, Washington D.C., USA.
George GreerPresident's Malaria Initiative, U.S. Agency for International Development, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Megan FotheringhamPresident's Malaria Initiative, U.S. Agency for International Development, Washington D.C., USA.
Lilia GerbergPresident's Malaria Initiative, U.S. Agency for International Development, Washington D.C., USA.
Matthew LynchMalaria Consortium, Juba, South Sudan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundContinuous distribution of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) has now been accepted as one way of sustaining ITN universal coverage. Community-based channels offer an interesting means of delivering ITNs to households to sustain universal ITN coverage. The objective of this study was to provide proof of concept for this channel.

methodsA 9-month, community-based, distribution pilot was implemented beginning 1 year after a mass campaign in Lainya County, South Sudan from 2012 to 2013. Following social mobilization, community members could request an ITN from a net coupon holder. Eligibility criteria included having lost an ITN, giving birth outside of the health facility, or not having enough ITNs for all household members. After verification, households could exchange the coupon for an ITN at a distribution point. The evaluation was a pre/post design using representative household surveys with two-stage cluster sampling and a sample size of 600 households per survey.

resultsAt endline, 78% of respondents were aware of the scheme and 89% of those also received an ITN through community-based distribution. Population access to ITNs nearly doubled, from 38% at baseline to 66% after the pilot. Household ownership of any ITN and enough ITNs (1 for 2 people) also increased significantly, from 66 to 82% and 19 to 46%, respectively. Community-based distribution was the only source of ITNs for 53.4% of households. The proportion of the population using an ITN last night increased from 22.7% at baseline to 53.9% at endline. A logistic regression model indicates that although behaviour change communication was positively associated with an increase in ITN use, access to enough nets was the greatest determinant of use.

conclusionsITN access and use improved significantly in the study area during the pilot, coming close to universal coverage targets. This pilot serves as proof of concept for the community-based distribution methodology implemented as a mechanism to sustain ITN universal coverage. Longer periods of implementation should be evaluated to determine whether community-based distribution can successfully maintain ITN coverage beyond the short term, and reach all wealth quintiles equitably.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareHumansInsecticide-Treated BednetsMalariaMosquito ControlPilot ProjectsProof of Concept StudySouth SudanCommunity-basedInsecticide-treated netInsecticide-treated net distributionMalariaSouth Sudan

Identifiers

PMID28893263
PMCPMC5594500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.