Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28893246›Full record

ArticleAnnals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials2017

Voriconazole and posaconazole therapeutic drug monitoring: a retrospective study.

Whitley M Yi, Kelly E Schoeppler, Jaclyn Jaeger, Scott W Mueller, Robert MacLaren, Douglas N Fish, Tyree H Kiser

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Evaluation of voriconazole therapeutic drug monitoring in malignant hematology patients.Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  5. Managing Invasive Fungal Infections During Allogeneic Hematopoietic Transplantation: A 2025 Update.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Antifungal Prophylaxis and Treatment of Breakthrough Invasive Fungal Diseases in High-Risk Hematology Patients: A Prospective Observational Multicenter Study.Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Guidelines for Antibiotics Prescription in Critically Ill Patients.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Whitley M YiUniversity of Colorado, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 12850 E Montview Blvd, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Kelly E SchoepplerDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Colorado Hospital, 12605 E 16th Ave, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Jaclyn JaegerUniversity of Colorado, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 12850 E Montview Blvd, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Scott W MuellerDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 12850 E Montview Blvd, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Robert MacLarenDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 12850 E Montview Blvd, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Douglas N FishDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 12850 E Montview Blvd, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Tyree H KiserDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 12850 E Montview Blvd, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA. Ty.Kiser@ucdenver.edu.
University of Montana · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTherapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) aims to minimize the clinical impact of posaconazole and voriconazole pharmacokinetic variability. However, its benefits on clinical outcomes are still being defined. Additionally, TDM data are limited for posaconazole IV and delayed-release tablet formulations among specific patient populations, including critically ill. The aim of this study was to determine the percentage of therapeutic posaconazole and voriconazole drug levels across all formulations in a real-world clinical setting and elucidate factors affecting attainment of target concentrations.

methodsThis study was a retrospective cohort study conducted at the University of Colorado Hospital between September 2006 and June 2015 that evaluated patients who received posaconazole or voriconazole TDM as part of routine care.

resultsVoriconazole (n = 250) and posaconazole (n = 100) levels were analyzed from 151 patients. Of these, 54% of voriconazole and 69% of posaconazole levels were therapeutic. For posaconazole, 14/38 (37%), 28/29 (97%) and 27/33 (82%) levels were therapeutic for the oral suspension, IV, and delayed-release tablet, respectively. Intravenous and delayed-release tablet posaconazole were 20 fold (p < 0.01) and sevenfold (p = 0.002) more likely than the oral suspension to achieve a therapeutic level. Subsequent levels were more likely to be therapeutic after dose adjustments (OR 3.31; 95% CI 1.3-8.6; p = 0.02), regardless of timing of initial non-therapeutic level. In a multivariable logistic regression analysis, no characteristics were independently predictive of therapeutic voriconazole levels and only absence of H2RA/PPI use was independently predictive of therapeutic posaconazole levels. There was no correlation between survival and therapeutic drug levels for either voriconazole (p = 0.67) or posaconazole (p = 0.50).

conclusionsA high percentage of drug levels did not achieve TDM targets for voriconazole and posaconazole oral suspension, supporting the need for routine TDM for those formulations. The utility of TDM for the IV and delayed-release tablet formulations of posaconazole is less apparent.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravenousAdministration, OralAdultAntifungal AgentsColoradoDrug CompoundingDrug MonitoringFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeTriazolesAntifungal AgentsposaconazoleTriazolesVoriconazoleInvasive fungal diseasePosaconazoleTherapeutic drug monitoringVoriconazole

Identifiers

PMID28893246
PMCPMC5594434
OpenAlexW2756221400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.