Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28893235›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2017

Inadequate birth spacing is perceived as riskier than all family planning methods, except sterilization and abortion, in a qualitative study among urban Nigerians.

Hilary M Schwandt, Joanna Skinner, Luciana Estelle Hebert, Lisa Cobb, Abdulmumin Saad, Mojisola Odeku

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Factors Associated with Inadequate Birth Intervals in the BRISA Birth Cohort, Brazil.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hilary M SchwandtCenter for Communication Programs, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. hilary.schwandt@wwu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3959-9594
Joanna SkinnerCenter for Communication Programs, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Luciana Estelle HebertCenter for Interdisciplinary Inquiry and Innovation in Sexual and Reproductive Health, Section of Family Planning and Contraceptive Research, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Chicago, Chicago, USA.
Lisa CobbCenter for Communication Programs, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Abdulmumin SaadNigerian Urban Reproductive Health Initiative, Abuja, Nigeria.
Mojisola OdekuNigerian Urban Reproductive Health Initiative, Abuja, Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFertility is high in Nigeria and contraceptive use is low. Little is known about how urban Nigerians perceive the risk of contraceptive use in relation to pregnancy and birth. This study examines and compares the risk perception of family planning methods and pregnancy related scenarios among urban Nigerians.

methodsA total of 26 focus group discussions with 243 participants were conducted in September and October 2010 in Ibadan and Kaduna. The groups were stratified by sex, age, family planning use, and city. Study participants were asked to identify the risk associated with six different family planning methods and four pregnancy related risks. The data were coded in ATLAS.ti 6 and analyzed using the thematic content analysis approach.

resultsThe ten family planning and pregnancy related items ranked as follows from most to least risky: sterilization, abortion, getting pregnant soon after having a baby (no birth spacing), pill, IUD, injectable, having a birth under 18 years of age (teenage motherhood), condom use, having six children, and fertility awareness methods. Risk of family planning methods was often categorized in terms of side effects and complications. Positive perceptions of teenage motherhood and having many children influenced the low ranking of these items.

conclusionInadequate birth spacing was rated as more risky than all contraceptive methods and pregnancy related events except for sterilization and abortion. Some of the participants' risk perceptions of contraceptives and pregnancy related scenarios does not correspond to actual risk of methods and practices. Instead, the items' perceived riskiness largely correspond with prevailing social norms. However, there was a high level of understanding of the risks of inadequate birth spacing. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This study is not a randomized control trial so the study has not been registered as such.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultBirth IntervalsContraceptionContraception BehaviorFamily Planning ServicesFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNigeriaPregnancyQualitative ResearchRisk FactorsSterilization, ReproductiveBirth spacingContraceptionNigeriaRisk

Identifiers

PMID28893235
PMCPMC5594467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.