Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28892913›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR2017

Krishnappa Amita, Abhishek Mandya Govind, Tony Pechiat, Sanjay Manchaih, Shivshankar Vijay Shankar

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Krishnappa AmitaAssociate Professor, Department of Pathology, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, BG Nagara, Mandya, Karnataka, India.
Abhishek Mandya GovindAssociate Professor, Department of Pathology, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, BG Nagara, Mandya, Karnataka, India.
Tony PechiatPost graduate, Department of Pathology, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, BG Nagara, Mandya, Karnataka, India.
Sanjay ManchaihAssistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, BG Nagara, Mandya, Karnataka, India.
Shivshankar Vijay ShankarProfessor and Head, Department of Pathology, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, BG Nagara, Mandya, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A 60-year-old male, diabetic presented with a soft tissue mass over the right forearm of 15 days duration. The swelling was 5 x 3 cm and a clinical diagnosis of neurofibroma was made. Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) was done using standard technique. Smears showed predominantly suppurative inflammation, foreign body giant cells, granulomas and fungal hyphae. KOH mount, culture and germ tube test was positive. Final diagnosis of fungal granuloma was made. Fungal infections should be included in the differential diagnosis of a soft tissue mass lesion. All soft tissue suppurative inflammatory lesions should be diligently screened to look for pathogens if any. Diagnostics in medicine have taken a major leap with advent of molecular technologies. Despite this, simple old traditional methods like FNAC supplemented by other basic laboratory techniques like KOH mount and culture still form the cream of a diagnostic laboratory and can come as a savior for the pathologist, the clinicians and the patients.

Indexed as

FungusGerm tube testGranuloma

Identifiers

PMID28892913
PMCPMC5583920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.