Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28892897›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR2017

Anaerobic Bacteria in Clinical Specimens - Frequent, But a Neglected Lot: A Five Year Experience at a Tertiary Care Hospital.

Padmaja Ananth Shenoy, Shashidhar Vishwanath, Ashwini Gawda, Seema Shetty, Renuka Anegundi, Muralidhar Varma, Chiranjay Mukhopadhyay, Kiran Chawla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Molecular characterization ofVeterinary and animal science · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Clinico-microbiological profile ofThe Indian journal of medical research · 2021
    Observational
  13. Correlation Between Microbiological Profiles of Adenoid Tissue and Nasal Discharge in Children with Co-existent Chronic Adenoiditis and Chronic Rhinosinusitis.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2020
    Article
  14. Genome Characterization of a Novel WastewaterFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  15. Observational
  16. [Towards the empirical treatment of choice in anaerobic infections].Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Padmaja Ananth ShenoyAssociate Professor, Department of Microbiology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Shashidhar VishwanathAssociate Professor, Department of Microbiology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Ashwini GawdaPostgraduate Student, Department of Microbiology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Seema ShettySenior Lecturer, Department of Microbiology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Renuka AnegundiAssistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Muralidhar VarmaAssociate Professor, Department of Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Chiranjay MukhopadhyayProfessor, Department of Microbiology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Kiran ChawlaProfessor and Head, Department of Microbiology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Manipal, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAnaerobic bacteria which constitute a significant proportion of the normal microbiota also cause variety of infections involving various anatomic sites. Considering the tedious culture techniques with longer turnaround time, anaerobic cultures are usually neglected by clinicians and microbiologists.

aimTo study the frequency of isolation of different anaerobic bacteria from various clinical specimens. MATERIALS AND

methodsA retrospective study to analyse the frequency of isolation of different anaerobic bacteria, was conducted over a period of five years from 2011 to 2015 including various clinical specimens submitted to anaerobic division of Microbiology laboratory. Anaerobic bacteria were isolated and identified following standard bacteriological techniques.

resultsPathogenic anaerobes (n=336) were isolated from 278 (12.48%) of overall 2227 specimens processed with an average yield of 1.2 isolates. Anaerobes were isolated as polymicrobial flora with or without aerobic bacterial pathogens in 159 (57.2%) patients. Anaerobic Gram-negative bacilli (140, 41.7%) were the predominant isolates.

conclusionPathogenic anaerobes were isolated from various infection sites. Unless culture and susceptibility tests are performed as a routine, true magnitude of antimicrobial resistance among anaerobic pathogens will not be known. Knowledge of the distribution of these organisms may assist in the selection of appropriate empirical therapy for anaerobic infections.

Indexed as

AbscessAnaerobeGram-negative bacilliGram-positive cocciPolymicrobial infections

Identifiers

PMID28892897
PMCPMC5583845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.