Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28892889›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR2017

Fungal Rhinosinusitis: Microbiological and Histopathological Perspective.

Ajay Kumar Singh, Prashant Gupta, Nitya Verma, Vineeta Khare, Abrar Ahamad, Virendra Verma, S P Agarwal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Medical mycology case reports · 2025
    Article
  2. Evaluation of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) combined with quantitative PCR: cutting-edge methods for rapid diagnosis of non-invasive fungal rhinosinusitis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Clinicomycological Profile of Fungal Rhinosinusitis in South India.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A study on the fungal rhinosinusitis: Causative agents, symptoms, and predisposing factors.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2023
    Article
  7. Heliyon · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Granulomatous InvasiveJournal of investigative medicine high impact case reports
    Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ajay Kumar SinghAssociate Professor, Department of Pathology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Prashant GuptaAssociate Professor, Department of Microbiology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Nitya VermaPh. D Scholar, Department of Microbiology, Santosh Medical University, Ghajiabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Vineeta KhareAssociate Professor, Department of Microbiology, Era's Lucknow Medical College, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Abrar AhamadPh. D Scholar, Department of Microbiology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Virendra VermaProfessor, Department of Ear, Nose and Throat, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
S P AgarwalProfessor, Department of Ear, Nose and Throat, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
King George's Medical University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOn the basis of histopathology Fungal Rhinosinusitis (FRS) is categorized into non-invasive (allergic fungal rhinosinusitis, fungal ball) and invasive (acute invasive, chronic invasive and granulomatous invasive fungal sinusitis). This differentiation helps to decide the treatment. Role of latest molecular methods such as PCR and conventional methods such as KOH microscopy and culture also needs to be evaluated. Therefore, in this study we planned to categorise fungal rhinosinusitis on the basis of histopathology and compare it with other methods such as PCR, culture and KOH microscopy.

aimTo analyse fungal rhinosinusitis cases by both histopathologically and microbiologically. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 76 clinically suspected fungal rhinosinusitis cases were included in the study. The tissue of suspected cases were processed and examined by KOH microscopy, histopathologically, culture and PCR. Histopathological examination was done by PAS, GMS and H&E stain.

resultsFRS was diagnosed in 37 (48.68%) cases out of 76 clinically suspected cases of FRS. In which 17 (22.3%) cases were positive by direct microscopy, 21 (27.6%) by culture, 27 (35.5%) by PCR and 14 (18.42%) by histopathology. Approximately 14 cases of FRS were classified according to histopathology; 10 (71.3%) as non-invasive FRS. Out of these 10, 9 (64.2%) were classified as AFRS and 1 (7.14%) as fungal ball. Only 4 cases (28.5%) were diagnosed with invasive FRS. Out of these 4 cases, 2 (14.2%) were of chronic invasive fungal rhinosinusitis, 1 (7.14%) was of granulomatous invasive fungal rhinosinusitis and 1 (7.14%) was of acute fulminant invasive fungal rhinosinusitis. Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis (AFRS) is the most common type of FRS.

conclusionDiagnosis should not be based on the single method. It should be done by both histopathological and microbiological methods, especially for those cases which are difficult to diagnose.

Indexed as

AllergyCultureFungal ballHistopathology

Identifiers

PMID28892889
PMCPMC5583846
OpenAlexW2740811751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.