ReviewTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation2017
Regenerative immunology: the immunological reaction to biomaterials.
Review in Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immunomodulatory Delivery Materials for Tissue Repair.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025Review
- Human amniotic membrane scaffold enhances adipose mesenchymal stromal cell mitochondrial bioenergetics promoting their regenerative capacities.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2025Article
- Comprehensive biocompatibility profiling of human pancreas-derived biomaterial.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Immunoengineering Biomaterials for Musculoskeletal Tissue Repair across Lifespan.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2024Review
- The Need for Smart Materials in an Expanding Smart World: MXene-Based Wearable Electronics and Their Advantageous Applications.ACS omega · 2024Review
- A Fresh Glimpse into Cartilage Immune Privilege.Cartilage · 2022Review
- Polymer-Based Constructs for Flexor Tendon Repair: A Review.Polymers · 2022Review
- Research Progress on the Immunogenicity and Regeneration of Acellular Adipose Matrix: A Mini Review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- RNU (Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Recent Advances in Kidney Bioengineering.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021Review
- Engineered biomaterials for heart disease.Current opinion in biotechnology · 2020Review
- Immunological Effects of a Single Hemodialysis Treatment.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2020Review
- Challenges in Fabrication of Tissue-Engineered Cartilage with Correct Cellular Colonization and Extracellular Matrix Assembly.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Review
- [Regeneration - A New Therapeutic Dimension in Otorhinolaryngology].Laryngo- rhino- otologie · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Regenerative medicine promises to meet two of the most urgent needs of modern organ transplantation, namely immunosuppression-free transplantation and an inexhaustible source of organs. Ideally, bioengineered organs would be manufactured from a patient's own biomaterials-both cells and the supporting scaffolding materials in which cells would be embedded and allowed to mature to eventually regenerate the organ in question. While some groups are focusing on the feasibility of this approach, few are focusing on the immunogenicity of the scaffolds that are being developed for organ bioengineering purposes. This review will succinctly discuss progress in the understanding of immunological characteristics and behavior of different scaffolds currently under development, with emphasis on the extracellular matrix scaffolds obtained decellularized animal or human organs which seem to provide the ideal template for bioengineering purposes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.