Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28892497›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Improved DOP-PCR (iDOP-PCR): A robust and simple WGA method for efficient amplification of low copy number genomic DNA.

Konstantin A Blagodatskikh, Vladimir M Kramarov, Ekaterina V Barsova, Alexey V Garkovenko, Dmitriy S Shcherbo, Andrew A Shelenkov, Vera V Ustinova, Maria R Tokarenko, Simon C Baker, Tatiana V Kramarova and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. New Perspectives for Whole Genome Amplification in Forensic STR Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Konstantin A BlagodatskikhAll-Russia Institute of Agricultural Biotechnology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Vladimir M KramarovAll-Russia Institute of Agricultural Biotechnology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Ekaterina V BarsovaShemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Alexey V GarkovenkoShemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Dmitriy S ShcherboShemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Andrew A ShelenkovVavilov Institute of General Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Vera V UstinovaSyntol JSC, Moscow, Russia.
Maria R TokarenkoEvrogen JSC, Moscow, Russia.
Simon C BakerBioline Ltd, London, United Kingdom.
Tatiana V KramarovaThe Department of Molecular Biosciences, The Wenner-Gren Institute, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3818-6560
Konstantin B IgnatovAll-Russia Institute of Agricultural Biotechnology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whole-genome amplification (WGA) techniques are used for non-specific amplification of low-copy number DNA, and especially for single-cell genome and transcriptome amplification. There are a number of WGA methods that have been developed over the years. One example is degenerate oligonucleotide-primed PCR (DOP-PCR), which is a very simple, fast and inexpensive WGA technique. Although DOP-PCR has been regarded as one of the pioneering methods for WGA, it only provides low genome coverage and a high allele dropout rate when compared to more modern techniques. Here we describe an improved DOP-PCR (iDOP-PCR). We have modified the classic DOP-PCR by using a new thermostable DNA polymerase (SD polymerase) with a strong strand-displacement activity and by adjustments in primers design. We compared iDOP-PCR, classic DOP-PCR and the well-established PicoPlex technique for whole genome amplification of both high- and low-copy number human genomic DNA. The amplified DNA libraries were evaluated by analysis of short tandem repeat genotypes and NGS data. In summary, iDOP-PCR provided a better quality of the amplified DNA libraries compared to the other WGA methods tested, especially when low amounts of genomic DNA were used as an input material.

Indexed as

DNA PrimersGene DosageGenome, HumanGenomicsDNA Copy Number VariationsGene LibraryGenotypeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansPolymerase Chain ReactionDNA Primers

Identifiers

PMID28892497
PMCPMC5593185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.