Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28892479›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2017

Towards Chagas disease elimination: Neonatal screening for congenital transmission in rural communities.

Pamela Marie Pennington, José Guillermo Juárez, Margarita Rivera Arrivillaga, Sandra María De Urioste-Stone, Katherine Doktor, Joe P Bryan, Clara Yaseli Escobar, Celia Cordón-Rosales

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Pamela Marie PenningtonCenter for Health Studies, Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, Guatemala City, Guatemala.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1619-8739
José Guillermo JuárezCenter for Health Studies, Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Margarita Rivera ArrivillagaCenter for Health Studies, Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Sandra María De Urioste-StoneSchool of Forest Resources, University of Maine, Orono, Maine, United States of America.
Katherine DoktorUniversity of Miami, Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, Florida, United States of America.
Joe P BryanCenters for Disease Control and Prevention Central America Regional Office, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Clara Yaseli EscobarDistrito de Salud de Comapa, Jutiapa, Ministerio de Salud PuÂblica y Asistencia Social de Guatemala.
Celia Cordón-RosalesCenter for Health Studies, Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Universidad del Valle de Guatemala · GTCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USUniversity of Maine · USUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

CGH CDC HHS U51 GH000970
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chagas disease is a neglected tropical disease that continues to affect populations living in extreme poverty in Latin America. After successful vector control programs, congenital transmission remains as a challenge to disease elimination. We used the PRECEDE-PROCEED planning model to develop strategies for neonatal screening of congenital Chagas disease in rural communities of Guatemala. These communities have persistent high triatomine infestations and low access to healthcare. We used mixed methods with multiple stakeholders to identify and address maternal-infant health behaviors through semi-structured interviews, participatory group meetings, archival reviews and a cross-sectional survey in high risk communities. From December 2015 to April 2016, we jointly developed a strategy to illustratively advertise newborn screening at the Health Center. The strategy included socioculturally appropriate promotional and educational material, in collaboration with midwives, nurses and nongovernmental organizations. By March 2016, eight of 228 (3.9%) pregnant women had been diagnosed with T. cruzi at the Health Center. Up to this date, no neonatal screening had been performed. By August 2016, seven of eight newborns born to Chagas seropositive women had been parasitologically screened at the Health Center, according to international standards. Thus, we implemented a successful community-based neonatal screening strategy to promote congenital Chagas disease healthcare in a rural setting. The success of the health promotion strategies developed will depend on local access to maternal-infant services, integration with detection of other congenital diseases and reliance on community participation in problem and solution definition.

Indexed as

Disease EradicationNeonatal ScreeningChagas DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesGuatemalaHealth Services AdministrationHumansInfant, NewbornInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalInterviews as TopicRural Population

Identifiers

PMID28892479
PMCPMC5634652
OpenAlexW2754343174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.