SynthesisAmerican journal of public health2017
A Conceptual Framework for the Evaluation of Emergency Risk Communications.
Synthesis in American journal of public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Developing a theory of risk communication for biological events: A grounded theory study in Iran as a lower middle-income country.Journal of education and health promotion · 2026Article
- Current Approaches To and Implementation of Information Environment Assessments in the Context of Public Health: Rapid Review.JMIR infodemiology · 2025Article
- Fighting the infodemic: the 4 i Framework for Advancing Communication and Trust.BMC public health · 2023Review
- Age, gender, and setting's effect on community pharmacists' stress and confidence in the COVID-19 pandemic.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2023Article
- [Preparedness on Assaults with Highly Toxic Substances in Public Space].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2022Article
- Process and components of disaster risk communication in health systems: A thematic analysis.Jamba (Potchefstroom, South Africa) · 2022Article
- The impact of negative emotional reactions on parental vaccine hesitancy after the 2018 vaccine event in China: A cross-sectional survey.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2021Article
- Evaluating simulations as preparation for health crises like CoVID-19: Insights on incorporating simulation exercises for effective response.International journal of disaster risk reduction : IJDRR · 2021Article
- Perception survey of crisis and emergency risk communication in an acute hospital in the management of COVID-19 pandemic in Singapore.BMC public health · 2020Article
- An Evaluation of the Literacy Demands of Online Natural Disaster Preparedness Materials for Families.Disaster medicine and public health preparedness · 2020Article
- Towards systematic evaluation of epidemic responses during humanitarian crises: a scoping review of existing public health evaluation frameworks.BMJ global health · 2020Article
- The Impact of the Online COVID-19 Infodemic on French Red Cross Actors' Field Engagement and Protective Behaviors: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR infodemiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo articulate a conceptual framework in support of evaluation activities in emergency risk communications (ERC).
methodsThe framework proposed is based on a systematic review of the scientific literature (2001-2016) combined with data derived from a series of semistructured interviews with experts and practitioners in ERC, and it is designed to support local, national, and international public health organizations in implementing evaluation studies in ERC.
resultsWe identified a list of ERC outcomes from the full-text review of 152 articles and categorized these into 3 groups, depending upon the level at which the outcome was measured: (1) information environment, (2) population, and (3) public health system. We analyzed interviewees' data from 18 interviews to identify practices and processes related to the effectiveness of ERC and included these as key structural components and processes in the developed evaluation framework.
conclusionsResearchers and public health practitioners interested in the evaluation of ERC can use the conceptual framework described in this article to guide the development of evaluation studies and methods for assessing communication outcomes related to public health emergencies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.