SynthesisBJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology2018
Cervical dilatation patterns of 'low-risk' women with spontaneous labour and normal perinatal outcomes: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- FIGO position statement on the use of the WHO labor care guide versus the partograph.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025Guideline
- Diagnostic accuracy of the partograph alert and action lines to predict adverse birth outcomes: a systematic review.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2019Pooled it
- Effect of partograph use on outcomes for women in spontaneous labour at term and their babies.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Cervical dilatation patterns of 'low-risk' women with spontaneous labour and normal perinatal outcomes: a systematic review.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2018Pooled it
- Duration of spontaneous labour in 'low-risk' women with 'normal' perinatal outcomes: A systematic review.European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology · 2018Pooled it
- Effect of implementation of the WHO intrapartum care model on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a randomized control trial.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Trial
- Early versus late amniotomy during induction of labor using oxytocin: A randomized controlled trial.PloS one · 2023Trial
- World Health Organization Labor Care Guide: scientific rationale, global adoption, and early policy implementation in the Republic of Moldova.AJOG global reports · 2026Article
- A nomogram to predict meconium-stained amniotic fluid in patients during labor: a retrospective cohort study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Establishment and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for Cephalic Dystocia in Parturients Under Epidural Labor Analgesia.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- A Comparative Observational Study on the WHO Labour Care Guide Versus the WHO Modified Partograph on Labour Outcome.Cureus · 2026Article
- Physiological plateaus during normal labor and birth: A novel definition.Birth (Berkeley, Calif.) · 2025Article
- Article
- Timing of cesarean section for prolonged labor in urban Tanzania: A criterion-based audit.AJOG global reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Inconsistent definitions of prolonged labor in international literature: a scoping review.AJOG global reports · 2024Article
- Labor patterns of spontaneous first-stage labor in Chinese women with normal neonatal outcomes.PloS one · 2024Observational
- Labor curves based on cervical dilatation over time and their accuracy and effectiveness: A systematic scoping review.PloS one · 2024Article
- Customization and acceptability of the WHO labor care guide to improve labor monitoring among health workers in Uganda. An iterative development, mixed method study.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- Inconsistent definitions of labour progress and over-medicalisation cause unnecessary harm during birth.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe call for women-centred approaches to reduce labour interventions, particularly primary caesarean section, has renewed an interest in gaining a better understanding of natural labour progression.
objectiveTo synthesise available data on the cervical dilatation patterns during spontaneous labour of 'low-risk' women with normal perinatal outcomes. SEARCH STRATEGY: PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, POPLINE, Global Health Library, and reference lists of eligible studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Observational studies and other study designs. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors extracted data on: maternal characteristics; labour interventions; the duration of labour centimetre by centimetre; and the duration of labour from dilatation at admission through to 10 cm. We pooled data across studies using weighted medians and employed the Bootstrap-t method to generate the corresponding confidence bounds. MAIN
resultsSeven observational studies describing labour patterns for 99 971 women met our inclusion criteria. The median time to advance by 1 cm in nulliparous women was longer than 1 hour until a dilatation of 5 cm was reached, with markedly rapid progress after 6 cm. Similar labour progression patterns were observed in parous women. The 95th percentiles for both parity groups suggest that it was not uncommon for some women to reach 10 cm, despite dilatation rates that were much slower than the 1-cm/hour threshold for most part of their first stage of labours.
conclusionAn expectation of a minimum cervical dilatation threshold of 1 cm/hour throughout the first stage of labour is unrealistic for most healthy nulliparous and parous women. Our findings call into question the universal application of clinical standards that are conceptually based on an expectation of linear labour progress in all women.
fundingUNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Cervical dilatation threshold of 1 cm/hour throughout labour is unrealistic for most women, regardless of parity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.