Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28891046›Full record

ArticleAnaesthesia2017

The association of postoperative pulmonary complications in 109,360 patients with pressure-controlled or volume-controlled ventilation.

A Bagchi, M I Rudolph, P Y Ng, F P Timm, D R Long, S Shaefi, K Ladha, M F Vidal Melo, M Eikermann

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anaesthesia, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. How I ventilate an obese patient.Critical care (London, England) · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

A BagchiDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
M I RudolphDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
P Y NgDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
F P TimmDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
D R LongDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
S ShaefiDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
K LadhaDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto and Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
M F Vidal MeloDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
M EikermannDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Harvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DEUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Intraoperative Protective Ventilation and Postoperative Pulmonary ComplicationsR34HL123438 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI VIDAL MELO, MARCOS F · 2015 to 2017
$599k
NHLBI NIH HHS R34 HL123438
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We thought that the rate of postoperative pulmonary complications might be higher after pressure-controlled ventilation than after volume-controlled ventilation. We analysed peri-operative data recorded for 109,360 adults, whose lungs were mechanically ventilated during surgery at three hospitals in Massachusetts, USA. We used multivariable regression and propensity score matching. Postoperative pulmonary complications were more common after pressure-controlled ventilation, odds ratio (95%CI) 1.29 (1.21-1.37), p < 0.001. Tidal volumes and driving pressures were more varied with pressure-controlled ventilation compared with volume-controlled ventilation: mean (SD) variance from the median 1.61 (1.36) ml.kg

Indexed as

AdultAgedAir PressureFemaleHumansIntermittent Positive-Pressure VentilationLung DiseasesLung Volume MeasurementsMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioPositive-Pressure RespirationPostoperative ComplicationsPropensity ScoreRespiration, ArtificialRisk Assessmentlung protection ventilation: pressure goalpressure-controlled ventilationvolume-controlled ventilation

Identifiers

PMID28891046
PMCPMC6696935
OpenAlexW2752250890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.