ArticleDIS. Designing Interactive Systems (Conference)2017
Creating Conditions for Patients' Values to Emerge in Clinical Conversations: Perspectives of Health Care Team Members.
Article in DIS. Designing Interactive Systems (Conference), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparative effectiveness of pharmacotherapy for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Pooled it
- "It Depends on the Situation": Variability in How Surgical Oncologists Elicit and Integrate Patient Values.Journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Designing Values Elicitation Technologies for Mental Health and Chronic Care Integration: User-Centered Design Approach.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- "When I do have some time, rather than spend it polishing silver, I want to spend it with my grandkids": a qualitative exploration of patient values following left ventricular assist device implantation.BMC palliative care · 2024Article
- "You Can See the Connections": Facilitating Visualization of Care Priorities in People Living with Multiple Chronic Health Conditions.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2023Article
- Primary Care Physician Perspectives on the Influence of Patient Values, Health Priorities, and Preferences on Clinical Decision-Making for Complex Patients with Multimorbidity: A Qualitative Study.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2022Article
- The Influence of Personal Health Data on the Health Coaching Process.Frontiers in big data · 2022Article
- Toward the Value Sensitive Design of eHealth Technologies to Support Self-management of Cardiovascular Diseases: Content Analysis.JMIR cardio · 2021Article
- Aligning care with the personal values of patients with complex care needs.Health services research · 2021Article
- Understanding Patient and Clinical Stakeholder Perspectives to Improve Adherence to Lung Cancer Screening.The Permanente journal · 2021Article
- The Perspectives of Professional Caregivers on Implementing Audio-Based Technology in Residential Dementia Care.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Supporting Communication About Values Between People with Multiple Chronic Conditions and their Providers.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2019Article
- Facilitating Self-reflection about Values and Self-care among Individuals with Chronic Conditions.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2019Article
- What's In Your Kit? Mental Health Technology Kits for Depression Self-Management.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI ConferenceArticle
- "Things That You Thought Mattered, None of That Matters": A Qualitative Exploration of Family Caregiver Values following Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.The Journal of cardiovascular nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Eliciting, understanding, and honoring patients' values- the things most important to them in daily life-is a cornerstone of patient-centered care. However, this rarely occurs explicitly as a routine part of clinical practice. This is particularly problematic for individuals with multiple chronic conditions (MCC) because they face difficult choices about how to balance competing demands for self-care in accordance with their values. In this study, we sought to inform the design of interventions to support conversations about patient values between patients with MCC and their health care providers. We conducted a field study that included observations of 21 clinic visits for patients who have MCC, and interviews with 16 care team members involved in those visits. This paper contributes a practice-based account of ways in which providers engage with patient values, and discusses how future work in interactive systems design might extend and enrich these engagements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.