Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28890940›Full record

ArticleNature ecology & evolution2017

Phylotranscriptomic consolidation of the jawed vertebrate timetree.

Iker Irisarri, Denis Baurain, Henner Brinkmann, Frédéric Delsuc, Jean-Yves Sire, Alexander Kupfer, Jörn Petersen, Michael Jarek, Axel Meyer, Miguel Vences and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 128 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
128citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

128 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Genomic Distortion of Jawed Vertebrate Phylogeny.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The evolution of muscle spindles.Experimental physiology · 2025
    Review
  11. Enigmatic Nodal and Lefty gene repertoire discrepancy: Latent evolutionary history revealed by vertebrate-wide phylogeny.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

68 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Iker IrisarriLehrstuhl für Zoologie und Evolutionsbiologie, Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Universitätsstrasse 10, Konstanz, 78464, Germany. irisarri.iker@gmail.com.
Denis BaurainInBioS-Eukaryotic Phylogenomics, Department of Life Sciences and PhytoSYSTEMS, University of Liège, Liège, 4000, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2388-6185
Henner BrinkmannLeibniz-Institut DSMZ-German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures, Braunschweig, 38124, Germany.
Frédéric DelsucInstitut des Sciences de l'Evolution, UMR 5554, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, 34095, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6501-6287
Jean-Yves SireInstitut de Biologie Paris-Seine, UMR7138, Sorbonne Universities, Paris, 75005, France.
Alexander KupferDepartment of Zoology, Stuttgart State Museum of Natural History, Stuttgart, 70191, Germany.
Jörn PetersenLeibniz-Institut DSMZ-German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures, Braunschweig, 38124, Germany.
Michael JarekDepartment of Genome Analytics, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, 38124, Germany.
Axel MeyerLehrstuhl für Zoologie und Evolutionsbiologie, Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Universitätsstrasse 10, Konstanz, 78464, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0888-8193
Miguel VencesZoological Institute, Braunschweig University of Technology, Braunschweig, 38106, Germany.
Hervé PhilippeCentre for Biodiversity Theory and Modelling, UMR CNRS 5321, Station of Theoretical and Experimental Ecology, Moulis, 09200, France. herve.philippe@sete.cnrs.fr.

Funding

European Research Council 293700
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phylogenomics is extremely powerful but introduces new challenges as no agreement exists on "standards" for data selection, curation and tree inference. We use jawed vertebrates (Gnathostomata) as model to address these issues. Despite considerable efforts in resolving their evolutionary history and macroevolution, few studies have included a full phylogenetic diversity of gnathostomes and some relationships remain controversial. We tested a novel bioinformatic pipeline to assemble large and accurate phylogenomic datasets from RNA sequencing and find this phylotranscriptomic approach successful and highly cost-effective. Increased sequencing effort up to ca. 10Gbp allows recovering more genes, but shallower sequencing (1.5Gbp) is sufficient to obtain thousands of full-length orthologous transcripts. We reconstruct a robust and strongly supported timetree of jawed vertebrates using 7,189 nuclear genes from 100 taxa, including 23 new transcriptomes from previously unsampled key species. Gene jackknifing of genomic data corroborates the robustness of our tree and allows calculating genome-wide divergence times by overcoming gene sampling bias. Mitochondrial genomes prove insufficient to resolve the deepest relationships because of limited signal and among-lineage rate heterogeneity. Our analyses emphasize the importance of large curated nuclear datasets to increase the accuracy of phylogenomics and provide a reference framework for the evolutionary history of jawed vertebrates.

Indexed as

cross-validationGnathostomatajackknifingmolecular datingphylogenyRNA-Seqsubstitution ratestranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID28890940
PMCPMC5584656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.